Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26913574›Full record

ArticleBiotechnology and bioengineering2016

Proteomic differences in recombinant CHO cells producing two similar antibody fragments.

Wolfgang Sommeregger, Patrick Mayrhofer, Willibald Steinfellner, David Reinhart, Michael Henry, Martin Clynes, Paula Meleady, Renate Kunert

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biotechnology and bioengineering, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
2.1field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. A proteomics approach to decipher a sticky CHO situation.Biotechnology and bioengineering · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Wolfgang SommereggerVienna Institute of BioTechnology (VIBT), University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Muthgasse 18, B, 5th Floor, 1190 Vienna, Austria.
Patrick MayrhoferVienna Institute of BioTechnology (VIBT), University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Muthgasse 18, B, 5th Floor, 1190 Vienna, Austria.
Willibald SteinfellnerVienna Institute of BioTechnology (VIBT), University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Muthgasse 18, B, 5th Floor, 1190 Vienna, Austria.
David ReinhartVienna Institute of BioTechnology (VIBT), University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Muthgasse 18, B, 5th Floor, 1190 Vienna, Austria.
Michael HenryNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology (NICB), Dublin City University, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Martin ClynesNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology (NICB), Dublin City University, Dublin 9, Ireland.
Paula MeleadyNational Institute for Cellular Biotechnology (NICB), Dublin City University, Dublin 9, Ireland. paula.meleady@dcu.ie.
Renate KunertVienna Institute of BioTechnology (VIBT), University of Natural Resources and Life Sciences, Muthgasse 18, B, 5th Floor, 1190 Vienna, Austria. renate.kunert@boku.ac.at.
BOKU University · ATDublin City University · IEPolymun (Austria) · AT

Funding

Austrian Science Fund FWF W 1224
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chinese hamster ovary (CHO) cells are the most commonly used mammalian hosts for the production of biopharmaceuticals. To overcome unfavorable features of CHO cells, a lot of effort is put into cell engineering to improve phenotype. "Omics" studies investigating elevated growth rate and specific productivities as well as extracellular stimulus have already revealed many interesting engineering targets. However, it remains largely unknown how physicochemical properties of the recombinant product itself influence the host cell. In this study, we used quantitative label-free LC-MS proteomic analyses to investigate product-specific proteome differences in CHO cells producing two similar antibody fragments. We established recombinant CHO cells producing the two antibodies, 3D6 and 2F5, both as single-chain Fv-Fc homodimeric antibody fragments (scFv-Fc). We applied three different vector strategies for transgene delivery (i.e., plasmid, bacterial artificial chromosome, recombinase-mediated cassette exchange), selected two best performing clones from transgene variants and transgene delivery methods and investigated three consecutively passaged cell samples by label-free proteomic analysis. LC-MS-MS profiles were compared in several sample combinations to gain insights into different aspects of proteomic changes caused by overexpression of two different heterologous proteins. This study suggests that not only the levels of specific product secretion but the product itself has a large impact on the proteome of the cell. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 2016;113: 1902-1912. © 2016 The Authors. Biotechnology and Bioengineering Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Indexed as

AnimalsBioreactorsCHO CellsCricetinaeCricetulusGene Transfer TechniquesModels, MolecularProtein StabilityProteomeProteomicsRecombinant ProteinsSingle-Chain AntibodiesProteomeRecombinant ProteinsSingle-Chain AntibodiesbottleneckChinese hamster ovary cellsendoplasmic reticulumsecretionspecific productivity

Identifiers

PMID26913574
PMCPMC4985663
OpenAlexW2273999377

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.