Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26913288›Full record

ArticleOpen forum infectious diseases2016

Long-Term Sentinel Surveillance for Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli and Non-O157 Shiga Toxin-Producing E. coli in Minnesota.

Carlota Medus, John M Besser, Billie A Juni, Bonnie Koziol, Victoria Lappi, Kirk E Smith, Craig W Hedberg

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Open forum infectious diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Acute Bacterial Gastroenteritis.Gastroenterology clinics of North America · 2021
    Review
  5. Confronting challenges to enterotoxigenicFrontiers in tropical diseases · 2021
    Article
  6. Epidemiology of EnterotoxigenicEpidemiology and infection · 2020
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli Infections.Current infectious disease reports · 2019
    Review
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Carlota MedusFoodborne, Waterborne, Vectorborne and Zoonotic Diseases Section.
John M BesserPublic Health Laboratory, Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul.
Billie A JuniPublic Health Laboratory, Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul.
Bonnie KoziolPublic Health Laboratory, Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul.
Victoria LappiPublic Health Laboratory, Minnesota Department of Health, St. Paul.
Kirk E SmithFoodborne, Waterborne, Vectorborne and Zoonotic Diseases Section.
Craig W HedbergFoodborne, Waterborne, Vectorborne and Zoonotic Diseases Section; Division of Environmental Health Sciences, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis.
Minnesota Department of Health · USWaterborne Environmental (United States) · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background.  Enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli (ETEC) and non-O157 Shiga toxin-producing E. coli (STEC) are not detected by conventional culture methods. The prevalence of ETEC infections in the United States is unknown, and recognized cases are primarily associated with foreign travel. Gaps remain in our understanding of STEC epidemiology. Methods.  Two sentinel surveillance sites were enrolled: an urban health maintenance organization laboratory (Laboratory A) and a rural hospital laboratory (Laboratory B). Residual sorbitol MacConkey (SMAC) plates from stool cultures performed at Laboratory A (1996-2006) and Laboratory B (2000-2008) were collected. Colony sweeps from SMAC plates were tested for genes encoding STEC toxins stx1 and stx2 (1996-2008) and ETEC heat-labile and heat-stable toxins eltB, estA 1, 2 and 3 (2000-2008) by polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based assays. Results.  In Laboratory A, a bacterial pathogen was identified in 7.0% of 21 970 specimens. During 1996-2006, Campylobacter was the most common bacterial pathogen (2.7% of cultures), followed by Salmonella (1.2%), Shigella (1.0%), and STEC (0.9%). Among STEC (n = 196), O157 was the most common serogroup (31%). During 2000-2006, ETEC (1.9%) was the second most common bacterial pathogen after Campylobacter (2.6%). In Laboratory B, of 19 293 specimens tested, a bacterial pathogen was identified for 5.5%, including Campylobacter (2.1%), STEC (1.3%), Salmonella (1.0%), and ETEC (0.8%). Among STEC (n = 253), O157 was the leading serogroup (35%). Among ETEC cases, 61% traveled internationally. Conclusions.  Enterotoxigenic E. coli and STEC infections were as common as most other enteric bacterial pathogens, and ETEC may be detected more frequently by culture-independent multiplex PCR diagnostic methods. A high proportion of ETEC cases were domestically acquired.

Indexed as

enterotoxigenic Escherichia colipathogenic Escherichia coliShiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli

Identifiers

PMID26913288
PMCPMC4761796
OpenAlexW2285565143

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.