Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26913227›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of spine surgery2016

Vertebroplasty and kyphoplasty for cervical spine metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Rafael De la Garza-Ramos, Mario Benvenutti-Regato, Enrique Caro-Osorio

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of spine surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 33 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Anterior mini-incision vesselplasty using bone filling container for C2 metastasis: a single center case series.European spine journal : official publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Complications of spine surgery for metastasis.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2020
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Surgical treatment for metastases of the cervical spine.European journal of orthopaedic surgery & traumatology : orthopedie traumatologie · 2017
    Article
  15. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rafael De la Garza-RamosTecnológico de Monterrey, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monterrey, México; Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Hospital Zambrano Hellion Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey, México.
Mario Benvenutti-RegatoTecnológico de Monterrey, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monterrey, México; Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Hospital Zambrano Hellion Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey, México; Department of Neurosurgery, Universidad Autónoma de Nuevo León, Monterrey, México.
Enrique Caro-OsorioTecnológico de Monterrey, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monterrey, México; Institute of Neurology and Neurosurgery, Hospital Zambrano Hellion Tecnológico de Monterrey, Monterrey, México.
Tecnológico de Monterrey · MXHospital Zambrano Hellion · MX

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundVertebroplasty (VP) and kyphoplasty (KP) are two minimally invasive techniques used to relieve pain and restore stability in metastatic spinal disease. However, most of these procedures are performed in the thoracolumbar spine, and there is limited data on outcomes after VP/KP for cervical metastases. The purpose of this article is to evaluate the safety and efficacy of VP and KP for treating pain in patients with cervical spine metastases.

methodsA systematic review of the literature was conducted using the PubMed and Medline databases. Only studies that reported five or more patients treated with VP/KP in the cervical spine were included. Levels of evidence and grades of recommendation were established based on the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine guidelines. Data was pooled to perform a meta-analysis for pain relief and complication rates.

resultsSix studies (all level 4 studies) met the inclusion criteria, representing 120 patients undergoing VP/KP at 135 vertebrae; the most common addressed level was C2 in 83 cases. The average volume of injected cement was 2.5 ± 0.5 milliliters at each vertebra. There were 22 asymptomatic cement leaks (16%; 95% CI, 9.8% - 22.2%) most commonly occurring in the paraspinal soft tissue. There were 5 complications (4%; 95% CI, 0.5% - 7.5%): 3 cases of mild odynophagia, 1 case of occipital neuralgia secondary to leak, and 1 case of stroke secondary to cement embolism. Pain relief was achieved in 89% of cases (range: 80 - 100%). The calculated average pain score decreased significantly from 7.6 ± 0.9 before surgery to 1.9 ± 0.8 at last evaluation (p=0.006).

conclusionAlthough the calculated complication rate after VP/KP in the cervical spine is low (4%) and the reported pain relief rate is approximately 89%, there is lack of high-quality evidence supporting this. Future randomized controlled trials are needed.

Indexed as

cervical metastaseskyphoplastyspinal metastasessystematic reviewvertebroplasty

Identifiers

PMID26913227
PMCPMC4752017
OpenAlexW2418077735

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.