ArticleF1000Research2015
BioShaDock: a community driven bioinformatics shared Docker-based tools registry.
Article in F1000Research, 2015. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- The role of metadata in reproducible computational research.Patterns (New York, N.Y.) · 2021Review
- Building Containerized Workflows Using the BioDepot-Workflow-Builder.Cell systems · 2019Article
- ParaDB: A manually curated database containing genomic annotation for the human pathogenic fungi Paracoccidioides spp.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2019Article
- Article
- Peptimapper: proteogenomics workflow for the expert annotation of eukaryotic genomes.BMC genomics · 2019Article
- LOLAweb: a containerized web server for interactive genomic locus overlap enrichment analysis.Nucleic acids research · 2018Article
- The Scientific Filesystem.GigaScience · 2018Article
- Field of genes: using Apache Kafka as a bioinformatic data repository.GigaScience · 2018Article
- An architecture for genomics analysis in a clinical setting using Galaxy and Docker.GigaScience · 2017Article
- BioContainers: an open-source and community-driven framework for software standardization.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2017Article
- Bio-Docklets: virtualization containers for single-step execution of NGS pipelines.GigaScience · 2017Article
- Using Docker Compose for the Simple Deployment of an Integrated Drug Target Screening Platform.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2017Article
- Nextflow enables reproducible computational workflows.Nature biotechnology · 2017Article
- GUIdock-VNC: using a graphical desktop sharing system to provide a browser-based interface for containerized software.GigaScience · 2017Article
- BIDS apps: Improving ease of use, accessibility, and reproducibility of neuroimaging data analysis methods.PLoS computational biology · 2017Article
- Using bio.tools to generate and annotate workbench tool descriptions.F1000Research · 2017Article
- The Dockstore: enabling modular, community-focused sharing of Docker-based genomics tools and workflows.F1000Research · 2017Article
- Use of application containers and workflows for genomic data analysis.Journal of pathology informatics · 2016Article
- GUIdock: Using Docker Containers with a Common Graphics User Interface to Address the Reproducibility of Research.PloS one · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Linux container technologies, as represented by Docker, provide an alternative to complex and time-consuming installation processes needed for scientific software. The ease of deployment and the process isolation they enable, as well as the reproducibility they permit across environments and versions, are among the qualities that make them interesting candidates for the construction of bioinformatic infrastructures, at any scale from single workstations to high throughput computing architectures. The Docker Hub is a public registry which can be used to distribute bioinformatic software as Docker images. However, its lack of curation and its genericity make it difficult for a bioinformatics user to find the most appropriate images needed. BioShaDock is a bioinformatics-focused Docker registry, which provides a local and fully controlled environment to build and publish bioinformatic software as portable Docker images. It provides a number of improvements over the base Docker registry on authentication and permissions management, that enable its integration in existing bioinformatic infrastructures such as computing platforms. The metadata associated with the registered images are domain-centric, including for instance concepts defined in the EDAM ontology, a shared and structured vocabulary of commonly used terms in bioinformatics. The registry also includes user defined tags to facilitate its discovery, as well as a link to the tool description in the ELIXIR registry if it already exists. If it does not, the BioShaDock registry will synchronize with the registry to create a new description in the Elixir registry, based on the BioShaDock entry metadata. This link will help users get more information on the tool such as its EDAM operations, input and output types. This allows integration with the ELIXIR Tools and Data Services Registry, thus providing the appropriate visibility of such images to the bioinformatics community.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.