ReviewCell & bioscience2016
On the way of revealing coactivator complexes cross-talk during transcriptional activation.
Review in Cell & bioscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed.
- Subunits Med12 and Med13 of Mediator Cooperate with Subunits SAYP and Bap170 of SWI/SNF in Active Transcription inInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2024Article
- Functional analysis of protein interactions using coupled bi-fluorescence complementation/GFP nanobody techniques.Nucleic acids research · 2024Article
- Transcriptional co-activators: emerging roles in signaling pathways and potential therapeutic targets for diseases.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2023Review
- Coregulators Reside withinInternational journal of molecular sciences · 2023Article
- Multifaceted Transcriptional Network of Estrogen-Related Receptor Alpha in Health and Disease.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- Involvement of the SAGA and TFIID coactivator complexes in transcriptional dysregulation caused by the separation of core and tail Mediator modules.G3 (Bethesda, Md.) · 2022Article
- Heart Enhancers: Development and Disease Control at a Distance.Frontiers in genetics · 2021Review
- Evolution of Regulated Transcription.Cells · 2020Review
- SET7/9 promotes multiple malignant processes in breast cancer development via RUNX2 activation and is negatively regulated by TRIM21.Cell death & disease · 2020Article
- A Dynamic Role of Mastermind-Like 1: A Journey Through the Main (Path)ways Between Development and Cancer.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2020Review
- Multifunctional ENY2 Protein Interacts with RNA Helicase MLE.Doklady. Biochemistry and biophysics · 2019Article
- The Development of Reporter System for the Investigation of Molecular Mechanisms of Ecdysone Response.Doklady. Biochemistry and biophysics · 2019Article
- Gene transcription in bursting: a unified mode for realizing accuracy and stochasticity.Biological reviews of the Cambridge Philosophical Society · 2019Article
- Transcriptional regulation of metabolism in disease: From transcription factors to epigenetics.PeerJ · 2018Article
- RNAi-Based Identification of Gene-Specific Nuclear Cofactor Networks Regulating Interleukin-1 Target Genes.Frontiers in immunology · 2018Article
- PSIP1/p75 promotes tumorigenicity in breast cancer cells by promoting the transcription of cell cycle genes.Carcinogenesis · 2017Article
- Review
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transcriptional activation is a complex, multistage process implemented by hundreds of proteins. Many transcriptional proteins are organized into coactivator complexes, which participate in transcription regulation at numerous genes and are a driver of this process. The molecular action mechanisms of coactivator complexes remain largely understudied. Relevant publications usually deal with the involvement of these complexes in the entire process of transcription, and only a few studies are aimed to elucidate their functions at its particular stages. This review summarizes available information on the participation of key coactivator complexes in transcriptional activation. The timing of coactivator complex binding/removal has been used for restructuring previously described information about the transcriptional process. Several major stages of transcriptional activation have been distinguished based on the presence of covalent histone modifications and general transcriptional factors, and the recruitment and/or removal phases have been determined for each coactivator included in analysis. Recruitment of Mediator, SWItch/Sucrose Non-Fermentable and NUcleosome Remodeling Factor complexes during transcription activation has been investigated thoroughly; CHD and INOsitol auxotrophy 80 families are less well studied. In most cases, the molecular mechanisms responsible for the removal of certain coactivator complexes after the termination of their functions at the promoters are still not understood. On the basis of the summarized information, we propose a scheme that illustrates the involvement of coactivator complexes in different stages of the transcription activation process. This scheme may help to gain a deeper insight into the molecular mechanism of functioning of coactivator complexes, find novel participants of the process, and reveal novel structural or functional connections between different coactivators.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.