ArticleFrontiers in neuroscience2016
Classification of Eye Fixation Related Potentials for Variable Stimulus Saliency.
Article in Frontiers in neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Brain Source Correlates of Speech Perception and Reading Processes in Children With and Without Reading Difficulties.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2022Article
- Eye Fixation-Related Potentials during Visual Search on Acquaintance and Newly-Learned Faces.Brain sciences · 2021Article
- Less imageable words lead to more looks to blank locations during memory retrieval.Psychological research · 2020Article
- Toward Measuring Target Perception: First-Order and Second-Order Deep Network Pipeline for Classification of Fixation-Related Potentials.Journal of healthcare engineering · 2020Article
- Using Fixation-Related Potentials for Inspecting Natural Interactions.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2020Article
- Co-registration of eye movements and neuroimaging for studying contextual predictions in natural reading.Language, cognition and neuroscience · 2020Article
- Integrating neurophysiologic relevance feedback in intent modeling for information retrieval.Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology · 2019Article
- Electrophysiological Measure of Impaired Information Processing in Drivers with Hematological Malignancy.Transportation research record · 2018Article
- Target probability modulates fixation-related potentials in visual search.Biological psychology · 2018Article
- Encoding of Target Detection during Visual Search by Single Neurons in the Human Brain.Current biology : CB · 2018Article
- Isolating Discriminant Neural Activity in the Presence of Eye Movements and Concurrent Task Demands.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2017Article
- EEG and Eye Tracking Signatures of Target Encoding during Structured Visual Search.Frontiers in human neuroscience · 2017Article
- Article
- The Berlin Brain-Computer Interface: Progress Beyond Communication and Control.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2016Review
- EEG Negativity in Fixations Used for Gaze-Based Control: Toward Converting Intentions into Actions with an Eye-Brain-Computer Interface.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveElectroencephalography (EEG) and eye tracking can possibly provide information about which items displayed on the screen are relevant for a person. Exploiting this implicit information promises to enhance various software applications. The specific problem addressed by the present study is that items shown in real applications are typically diverse. Accordingly, the saliency of information, which allows to discriminate between relevant and irrelevant items, varies. As a consequence, recognition can happen in foveal or in peripheral vision, i.e., either before or after the saccade to the item. Accordingly, neural processes related to recognition are expected to occur with a variable latency with respect to the eye movements. The aim was to investigate if relevance estimation based on EEG and eye tracking data is possible despite of the aforementioned variability. APPROACH: Sixteen subjects performed a search task where the target saliency was varied while the EEG was recorded and the unrestrained eye movements were tracked. Based on the acquired data, it was estimated which of the items displayed were targets and which were distractors in the search task.
resultsTarget prediction was possible also when the stimulus saliencies were mixed. Information contained in EEG and eye tracking data was found to be complementary and neural signals were captured despite of the unrestricted eye movements. The classification algorithm was able to cope with the experimentally induced variable timing of neural activity related to target recognition. SIGNIFICANCE: It was demonstrated how EEG and eye tracking data can provide implicit information about the relevance of items on the screen for potential use in online applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.