ArticleScience translational medicine2016
Exploiting evolutionary principles to prolong tumor control in preclinical models of breast cancer.
Article in Science translational medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 191 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
191 citing papers in PubMed, 326 citations in OpenAlex.
- Integrating evolutionary dynamics into treatment of metastatic castrate-resistant prostate cancer.Nature communications · 2017Trial
- Evolutionary Antifragile Therapy Is a Treatment Strategy to Suppress Drug Resistance by Exploiting Dose-Response Convexity.Cancer research · 2026Article
- Comprehensive overview of AI methodologies in nano-drug delivery Optimization and Design.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- Spatiotemporal heterogeneity in non-small cell lung cancer: A paradigm shift from characterization to dynamic management (Review).Oncology letters · 2026Review
- Hazard curvature makes within-host variability costly for survival.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026Article
- Tumor evolution: signaling pathways, molecular mechanisms and therapeutic targets.Signal transduction and targeted therapy · 2026Review
- Regulated cell death plasticity in cancer: thresholds, reversibility, and therapeutic failure.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- In silico models in oncology, neurology, and epidemiology: systems-level and multiscale perspectives.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Review
- When effective anticancer therapies are, in fact, destabilizing the tumor's Group Phenotypic Composition.NPJ precision oncology · 2026Review
- Single-threshold-guided adaptive cancer therapy with partial-cycle treatment: A mechanistic and reinforcement learning analysis.PLoS computational biology · 2026Article
- Beyond Darwin: reactive heredity, burst-drift dynamics and eco‑evolutionary control of cancer.Molecular cancer · 2026Review
- Review
- Mathematical modeling of ribosome competition informs testable treatment strategies for drug-tolerant cancer persister cells.iScience · 2026Article
- Evolutionary Double-Bind Treatment Using Radiation Therapy and Natural Killer Cell-Based Immunotherapy in Prostate Cancer.International journal of radiation oncology, biology, physics · 2026Article
- Delaying cancer progression by integrating toxicity constraints in a model of adaptive therapy.NPJ systems biology and applications · 2026Article
- Beyond static biomarkers: systems biology and AI for decoding cancer dynamics.Frontiers in systems biology · 2026Review
- A Systematic Review of Evidence for the Cost of Therapeutic Resistance in Cancer.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Directed Evolution Restored Castrate Sensitivity in a Patient With Castrate Resistant Metastatic Prostate Cancer.The Prostate · 2025Article
- Drug resistance in cancer: molecular mechanisms and emerging treatment strategies.Molecular biomedicine · 2025Review
- Impacts of competition and phenotypic plasticity on the viability of adaptive therapy.Mathematical biosciences · 2025Article
131 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
11 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Conventional cancer treatment strategies assume that maximum patient benefit is achieved through maximum killing of tumor cells. However, by eliminating the therapy-sensitive population, this strategy accelerates emergence of resistant clones that proliferate unopposed by competitors-an evolutionary phenomenon termed "competitive release." We present an evolution-guided treatment strategy designed to maintain a stable population of chemosensitive cells that limit proliferation of resistant clones by exploiting the fitness cost of the resistant phenotype. We treated MDA-MB-231/luc triple-negative and MCF7 estrogen receptor-positive (ER(+)) breast cancers growing orthotopically in a mouse mammary fat pad with paclitaxel, using algorithms linked to tumor response monitored by magnetic resonance imaging. We found that initial control required more intensive therapy with regular application of drug to deflect the exponential tumor growth curve onto a plateau. Dose-skipping algorithms during this phase were less successful than variable dosing algorithms. However, once initial tumor control was achieved, it was maintained with progressively smaller drug doses. In 60 to 80% of animals, continued decline in tumor size permitted intervals as long as several weeks in which no treatment was necessary. Magnetic resonance images and histological analysis of tumors controlled by adaptive therapy demonstrated increased vascular density and less necrosis, suggesting that vascular normalization resulting from enforced stabilization of tumor volume may contribute to ongoing tumor control with lower drug doses. Our study demonstrates that an evolution-based therapeutic strategy using an available chemotherapeutic drug and conventional clinical imaging can prolong the progression-free survival in different preclinical models of breast cancer.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.