Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26912758›Full record

ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2016

Multicenter Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry Study for Identification of Clinically Relevant Nocardia spp.

Sara J Blosser, Steven K Drake, Jennifer L Andrasko, Christina M Henderson, Kamal Kamboj, Stella Antonara, Lilia Mijares, Patricia Conville, Karen M Frank, Susan M Harrington and 2 more

Abstract readEvaluation StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Nocardiosis: A Neglected Disease.Medical principles and practice : international journal of the Kuwait University, Health Science Centre · 2020
    Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. PulmonaryCase reports in infectious diseases · 2026
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Open forum infectious diseases · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Outcomes of transplant recipients with pretransplant Nocardia colonization or infection.Transplant infectious disease : an official journal of the Transplantation Society · 2023
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Updated Review onClinical microbiology reviews · 2022
    Review
  13. Review
  14. Proteome-Based Serotyping of the Food-Borne PathogensMolecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Case reports in infectious diseases · 2021
    Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Sara J BlosserNational Institutes of Health, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology Service, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Steven K DrakeNational Institutes of Health, Critical Care Medicine Department, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Jennifer L AndraskoCleveland Clinic, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Christina M HendersonNational Institutes of Health, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology Service, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Kamal KambojThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Stella AntonaraNational Institutes of Health, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology Service, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Lilia MijaresNational Institutes of Health, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology Service, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Patricia ConvilleNational Institutes of Health, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology Service, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Karen M FrankNational Institutes of Health, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology Service, Bethesda, Maryland, USA.
Susan M HarringtonCleveland Clinic, Pathology and Laboratory Medicine Institute, Cleveland, Ohio, USA.
Joan-Miquel Balada-LlasatThe Ohio State University Wexner Medical Center, Department of Pathology, Columbus, Ohio, USA.
Adrian M ZelaznyNational Institutes of Health, Department of Laboratory Medicine, Microbiology Service, Bethesda, Maryland, USA azelazny@mail.nih.gov.

Funding

Identification of Clinically Important Microbes by Genomic and Proteomic MethodsZIACL080012 · CLC · CLINICAL CENTER · PI ZELAZNY, ADRIAN MARCELO · 2009 to 2025
$0k
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

This multicenter study analyzed Nocardia spp., including extraction, spectral acquisition, Bruker matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization-time of flight mass spectrometry (MALDI-TOF MS) identification, and score interpretation, using three Nocardia libraries, the Bruker, National Institutes of Health (NIH), and The Ohio State University (OSU) libraries, and compared the results obtained by each center. A standardized study protocol, 150 Nocardia isolates, and NIH and OSU Nocardia MALDI-TOF MS libraries were distributed to three centers. Following standardized culture, extraction, and MALDI-TOF MS analysis, isolates were identified using score cutoffs of ≥2.0 for species/species complex-level identification and ≥1.8 for genus-level identification. Isolates yielding a score of <2.0 underwent a single repeat extraction and analysis. The overall score range for all centers was 1.3 to 2.7 (average, 2.2 ± 0.3), with common species generally producing higher average scores than less common ones. Score categorization and isolate identification demonstrated 86% agreement between centers; 118 of 150 isolates were correctly identified to the species/species complex level by all centers. Nine strains (6.0%) were not identified by any center, and six (4.0%) of these were uncommon species with limited library representation. A categorical score discrepancy among centers occurred for 21 isolates (14.0%). There was an overall benefit of 21.2% from repeat extraction of low-scoring isolates and a center-dependent benefit for duplicate spotting (range, 2 to 8.7%). Finally, supplementation of the Bruker Nocardia MALDI-TOF MS library with both the OSU and NIH libraries increased the genus-level and species-level identification by 18.2% and 36.9%, respectively. Overall, this study demonstrates the ability of diverse clinical microbiology laboratories to utilize MALDI-TOF MS for the rapid identification of clinically relevant Nocardia spp. and to implement MALDI-TOF MS libraries developed by single laboratories across institutions.

Indexed as

Bacteriological TechniquesNocardiaNocardia InfectionsReproducibility of ResultsSensitivity and SpecificitySpectrometry, Mass, Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption-IonizationUnited States

Identifiers

PMID26912758
PMCPMC4844739

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.