Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26912640›Full record

ArticleBrain : a journal of neurology2016

Longitudinal evidence for anterograde trans-synaptic degeneration after optic neuritis.

Carmen Tur, Olivia Goodkin, Daniel R Altmann, Thomas M Jenkins, Katherine Miszkiel, Alessia Mirigliani, Camilla Fini, Claudia A M Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott, Alan J Thompson, Olga Ciccarelli and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Brain : a journal of neurology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 55 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
55citing papers in PubMed
7.9field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

55 citing papers in PubMed, 83 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Diffusion tensor imaging of optic neuropathies: a narrative review.Quantitative imaging in medicine and surgery · 2024
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Carmen Tur1 Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, University College London, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK c.tur@ucl.ac.uk ctur@cem-cat.org.
Olivia Goodkin1 Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, University College London, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Daniel R Altmann1 Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, University College London, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK 2 Medical Statistics Department, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, UK.
Thomas M Jenkins1 Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, University College London, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Katherine Miszkiel1 Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, University College London, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Alessia Mirigliani1 Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, University College London, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Camilla Fini1 Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, University College London, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Claudia A M Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott1 Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, University College London, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK 3 Brain Connectivity Center, C. Mondino National Neurological Institute, Pavia, Italy.
Alan J Thompson1 Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, University College London, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Olga Ciccarelli1 Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, University College London, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
Ahmed T Toosy1 Queen Square Multiple Sclerosis Centre, University College London, UCL Institute of Neurology, London, UK.
University College London · GBLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In multiple sclerosis, microstructural damage of normal-appearing brain tissue is an important feature of its pathology. Understanding these mechanisms is vital to help develop neuroprotective strategies. The visual pathway is a key model to study mechanisms of damage and recovery in demyelination. Anterograde trans-synaptic degeneration across the lateral geniculate nuclei has been suggested as a mechanism of tissue damage to explain optic radiation abnormalities seen in association with demyelinating disease and optic neuritis, although evidence for this has relied solely on cross-sectional studies. We therefore aimed to assess: (i) longitudinal changes in the diffusion properties of optic radiations after optic neuritis suggesting trans-synaptic degeneration; (ii) the predictive value of early optic nerve magnetic resonance imaging measures for late optic radiations changes; and (iii) the impact on visual outcome of both optic nerve and brain post-optic neuritis changes. Twenty-eight consecutive patients with acute optic neuritis and eight healthy controls were assessed visually (logMAR, colour vision, and Sloan 1.25%, 5%, 25%) and by magnetic resonance imaging, at baseline, 3, 6, and 12 months. Magnetic resonance imaging sequences performed (and metrics obtained) were: (i) optic nerve fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (optic nerve cross-sectional area); (ii) optic nerve proton density fast spin-echo (optic nerve proton density-lesion length); (iii) optic nerve post-gadolinium T1-weighted (Gd-enhanced lesion length); and (iv) brain diffusion-weighted imaging (to derive optic radiation fractional anisotropy, radial diffusivity, and axial diffusivity). Mixed-effects and multivariate regression models were performed, adjusting for age, gender, and optic radiation lesion load. These identified changes over time and associations between early optic nerve measures and 1-year global optic radiation/clinical measures. The fractional anisotropy in patients' optic radiations decreased (P = 0.018) and radial diffusivity increased (P = 0.002) over 1 year following optic neuritis, whereas optic radiation measures were unchanged in controls. Also, smaller cross-sectional areas of affected optic nerves at 3 months post-optic neuritis predicted lower fractional anisotropy and higher radial diffusivity at 1 year (P = 0.007) in the optic radiations, whereas none of the inflammatory measures of the optic nerve predicted changes in optic radiations. Finally, greater Gd-enhanced lesion length at baseline and greater optic nerve proton density-lesion length at 1 year were associated with worse visual function at 1 year (P = 0.034 for both). Neither the cross-sectional area of the affected optic nerve after optic neuritis nor the damage in optic radiations was associated with 1-year visual outcome. Our longitudinal study shows that, after optic neuritis, there is progressive damage to the optic radiations, greater in patients with early residual optic nerve atrophy, even after adjusting for optic radiation lesions. These findings provide evidence for trans-synaptic degeneration.

Indexed as

AdultFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleOptic NeuritisRetrograde DegenerationSynapsesVisual Pathwaysdiffusion tensor imagingmultiple sclerosisoptic neuritisoptic radiationstrans-synaptic degeneration

Identifiers

PMID26912640
PMCPMC5839599
OpenAlexW2278040179

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.