Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26912596›Full record

ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2016

Differential processing of binocular and monocular gloss cues in human visual cortex.

Hua-Chun Sun, Massimiliano Di Luca, Hiroshi Ban, Alexander Muryy, Roland W Fleming, Andrew E Welchman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hua-Chun SunSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom;ORCID 0000-0002-8724-7844
Massimiliano Di LucaSchool of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, United Kingdom;
Hiroshi BanCenter for Information and Neural Networks, National Institute of Information and Communications Technology, and Osaka University, Osaka, Japan; Graduate School of Frontier Biosciences, Osaka University, Osaka, Japan;
Alexander MuryySchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, United Kingdom;
Roland W FlemingDepartment of Psychology, Justus-Liebig-Universität Giessen, Germany; and.
Andrew E WelchmanDepartment of Psychology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom aew69@cam.ac.uk.

Funding

Wellcome Trust 095183/Z/10/Z
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The visual impression of an object's surface reflectance ("gloss") relies on a range of visual cues, both monocular and binocular. Whereas previous imaging work has identified processing within ventral visual areas as important for monocular cues, little is known about cortical areas involved in processing binocular cues. Here, we used human functional MRI (fMRI) to test for brain areas selectively involved in the processing of binocular cues. We manipulated stereoscopic information to create four conditions that differed in their disparity structure and in the impression of surface gloss that they evoked. We performed multivoxel pattern analysis to find areas whose fMRI responses allow classes of stimuli to be distinguished based on their depth structure vs. material appearance. We show that higher dorsal areas play a role in processing binocular gloss information, in addition to known ventral areas involved in material processing, with ventral area lateral occipital responding to both object shape and surface material properties. Moreover, we tested for similarities between the representation of gloss from binocular cues and monocular cues. Specifically, we tested for transfer in the decoding performance of an algorithm trained on glossy vs. matte objects defined by either binocular or by monocular cues. We found transfer effects from monocular to binocular cues in dorsal visual area V3B/kinetic occipital (KO), suggesting a shared representation of the two cues in this area. These results indicate the involvement of mid- to high-level visual circuitry in the estimation of surface material properties, with V3B/KO potentially playing a role in integrating monocular and binocular cues.

Indexed as

AdultAlgorithmsBrain MappingCuesFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMaleNeuropsychological TestsPhotic StimulationVision, BinocularVision, MonocularVisual CortexVisual PathwaysVisual PerceptionYoung Adultbinocular cuefMRImaterial perceptionMVPAspecularitysurface gloss

Identifiers

PMID26912596
PMCPMC4922602

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.