ArticleJournal of neurophysiology2016
Cooperation and competition of gamma oscillation mechanisms.
Article in Journal of neurophysiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Firing rate models for gamma oscillations in I-I and E-I networks.Journal of computational neuroscience · 2024Article
- High-frequency oscillations and sequence generation in two-population models of hippocampal region CA1.PLoS computational biology · 2022Article
- Integration, coincidence detection and resonance in networks of spiking neurons expressing Gamma oscillations and asynchronous states.PLoS computational biology · 2021Article
- Electrophysiology of the Human Superior Temporal Sulcus during Speech Processing.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2021Article
- Effects of Neuromodulation on Excitatory-Inhibitory Neural Network Dynamics Depend on Network Connectivity Structure.Journal of nonlinear science · 2020Article
- Phasic cholinergic signaling promotes emergence of local gamma rhythms in excitatory-inhibitory networks.The European journal of neuroscience · 2020Article
- Phase response theory explains cluster formation in sparsely but strongly connected inhibitory neural networks and effects of jitter due to sparse connectivity.Journal of neurophysiology · 2019Article
- Microsaccade-rhythmic modulation of neural synchronization and coding within and across cortical areas V1 and V2.PLoS biology · 2018Article
- Hippocampal Ripple Oscillations and Inhibition-First Network Models: Frequency Dynamics and Response to GABA Modulators.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2018Article
- Dichotomous Dynamics in E-I Networks with Strongly and Weakly Intra-connected Inhibitory Neurons.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2017Article
- Intrinsic Cellular Properties and Connectivity Density Determine Variable Clustering Patterns in Randomly Connected Inhibitory Neural Networks.Frontiers in neural circuits · 2016Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oscillations of neuronal activity in different frequency ranges are thought to reflect important aspects of cortical network dynamics. Here we investigate how various mechanisms that contribute to oscillations in neuronal networks may interact. We focus on networks with inhibitory, excitatory, and electrical synapses, where the subnetwork of inhibitory interneurons alone can generate interneuron gamma (ING) oscillations and the interactions between interneurons and pyramidal cells allow for pyramidal-interneuron gamma (PING) oscillations. What type of oscillation will such a network generate? We find that ING and PING oscillations compete: The mechanism generating the higher oscillation frequency "wins"; it determines the frequency of the network oscillation and suppresses the other mechanism. For type I interneurons, the network oscillation frequency is equal to or slightly above the higher of the ING and PING frequencies in corresponding reduced networks that can generate only either of them; if the interneurons belong to the type II class, it is in between. In contrast to ING and PING, oscillations mediated by gap junctions and oscillations mediated by inhibitory synapses may cooperate or compete, depending on the type (I or II) of interneurons and the strengths of the electrical and chemical synapses. We support our computer simulations by a theoretical model that allows a full theoretical analysis of the main results. Our study suggests experimental approaches to deciding to what extent oscillatory activity in networks of interacting excitatory and inhibitory neurons is dominated by ING or PING oscillations and of which class the participating interneurons are.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.