Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26912477›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2016

CRISPR/Cas9-mediated GJA8 knockout in rabbits recapitulates human congenital cataracts.

Lin Yuan, Tingting Sui, Mao Chen, Jichao Deng, Yongye Huang, Jian Zeng, Qingyan Lv, Yuning Song, Zhanjun Li, Liangxue Lai

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
43citing papers in PubMed
5.7field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

43 citing papers in PubMed, 67 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Through theGenes · 2024
    Review
  2. Review
  3. Characterization of a Novel Gja8 (Cx50) Mutation in a New Cataract Rat Model.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2023
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Gene Therapeutic Delivery to the Salivary Glands.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2023
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Highly efficient A-to-G base editing by ABE8.17 in rabbits.Molecular therapy. Nucleic acids · 2022
    Article
  9. Review
  10. No apparent p53 activation in CRISPR-engineered gene-edited rabbits.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2021
    Article
  11. Review
  12. Review
  13. CRISPR-Cas9: A Preclinical and Clinical Perspective for the Treatment of Human Diseases.Molecular therapy : the journal of the American Society of Gene Therapy · 2021
    Review
  14. Review
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. TheSaudi journal of biological sciences · 2020
    Article
  18. Genome engineering technologies in rabbits.Journal of biomedical research · 2020
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Modeling ocular lens disease in Xenopus.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lin YuanJilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo Engineering, College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, 130062, China.
Tingting SuiJilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo Engineering, College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, 130062, China.
Mao ChenJilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo Engineering, College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, 130062, China.
Jichao DengJilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo Engineering, College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, 130062, China.
Yongye HuangJilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo Engineering, College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, 130062, China.
Jian ZengJilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo Engineering, College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, 130062, China.
Qingyan LvJilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo Engineering, College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, 130062, China.
Yuning SongJilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo Engineering, College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, 130062, China.
Zhanjun LiJilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo Engineering, College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, 130062, China.
Liangxue LaiJilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Animal Embryo Engineering, College of Animal Sciences, Jilin University, Changchun, 130062, China.
Jilin University · CNGuangzhou Institutes of Biomedicine and Health · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cataracts are the leading cause of vision loss in the world, although surgical treatment can restore vision in cataract patients. Until now, there have been no adequate animal models for in vivo studies of artificial lens safety and drug interactions. Genetic studies have demonstrated that GJA8 is involved in maintaining lens opacity and proper lens development. In this study, a cataract model with GJA8 gene knockout was developed via co-injection of Cas9/sgRNA mRNA into rabbit zygotes. Our results showed that gene mutation efficiency in the GJA8 locus reached 98.7% in embryos and 100% in pups, demonstrating that the Cas9/sgRNA system is a highly efficient tool for gene editing in rabbits. In agreement with other studies, our genetic and histology results showed that impaired GJA8 function caused microphthalmia, small lens size and cataracts. In summary, our novel rabbit model of cataracts will be an important drug-screening tool for cataract prevention and treatment.

Indexed as

CRISPR-Cas SystemsGene Knockout TechniquesAnimalsBase SequenceCataractConnexin 50ConnexinsDisease Models, AnimalGene TargetingGenetic LociGenotypeHumansInheritance PatternsPhenotypeRabbitsZygoteConnexin 50Connexins

Identifiers

PMID26912477
PMCPMC4766569
OpenAlexW2275307830

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.