Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26912433›Full record

ArticleJournal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine2016

18F-FDG PET/CT Is an Immediate Imaging Biomarker of Treatment Success After Liver Metastasis Ablation.

Francois Cornelis, Vlasios Sotirchos, Elena Violari, Constantinos T Sofocleous, Heiko Schoder, Jeremy C Durack, Robert H Siegelbaum, Majid Maybody, John Humm, Stephen B Solomon

Erratum issuedOpen access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
3.7field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed, 57 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Advancements and Future Outlook of PET/CT-Guided Interventions.Techniques in vascular and interventional radiology · 2023
    Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. The Value ofDiagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2022
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Oncology and therapy · 2021
    Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Practice and prospects for PET/CT guided interventions.The quarterly journal of nuclear medicine and molecular imaging : official publication of the Italian Association of Nuclear Medicine (AIMN) [and] the International Association of Radiopharmacology (IAR), [and] Section of the Society of... · 2021
    Review
  19. Review
  20. The Role ofMolecular imaging and radionuclide therapy · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Francois CornelisDepartment of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York Department of Radiology, Pellegrin Hospital, Bordeaux, France.
Vlasios SotirchosDepartment of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Elena ViolariDepartment of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Constantinos T SofocleousDepartment of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Heiko SchoderDepartment of Radiology, Molecular Imaging and Therapy Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York; and.
Jeremy C DurackDepartment of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Robert H SiegelbaumDepartment of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Majid MaybodyDepartment of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
John HummDepartment of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York.
Stephen B SolomonDepartment of Radiology, Interventional Radiology Service, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York solomons@mskcc.org.
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USHôpital Pellegrin · FR

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Nicholas D Socci · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThe rationale of this study was to examine whether (18)F-FDG PET/CT and contrast-enhanced CT performed immediately after percutaneous ablation of liver metastases are predictors of local treatment failure at 1 y.

methodsThis Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act-compliant, Institutional Review Board-approved retrospective study reviewed 25 PET/CT-guided thermal ablations performed from September 2011 to March 2013 on 21 patients (11 women and 10 men; mean age, 56.8 y; range, 35-79 y) for the treatment of liver metastases (colorectal, n = 23; breast, n = 1; and sarcoma, n = 1). One to 3 tumors (mean size, 2.3 cm; range, 0.7-4.6 cm; mean SUVmax, 22.7; range, 9.5-77.1) were ablated using radiofrequency (n = 16) or microwave (n = 9) energy in a single session. Immediate-postablation enhanced CT and PET/CT scans were qualitatively evaluated by 2 reviewers independently, and the results were compared with clinical and imaging outcome at 1 y. The PET/CT scans were also analyzed to determine tissue radioactivity concentration (TRC) from 3-dimensional regions of interest in the ablation zone, the margin, and the surrounding normal liver to calculate a TRC ratio, which was then compared with outcome at 1 y. Receiver operating characteristics (ROC) were used, and the maximal-accuracy threshold in predicting recurrence was calculated.

resultsEleven (44%) of the 25 tumors recurred within 1 y. Enhanced CT did not significantly correlate with recurrence (P = 0.288). Accuracy was 64% (16/25), and the area under the ROC curve was 0.601 (95% confidence interval [95% CI], 0.387-0.789). The accuracy of the qualitative analysis of (18)F-FDG PET was 92% (23/25) (P < 0.001), and the area under the ROC curve was 0.929 (95% CI, 0.740-0.990). The mean TRC ratio was 40.6 in the recurrence group (SD, 9.2; range, 29.3-53.9) and 15.9 in the group without recurrence (SD, 7.3; range, 3-27.3). A TRC ratio of 28.3 predicted recurrence at 1 y with 100% accuracy (25/25) (P < 0.001), and the area under the ROC curve was 1 (95% CI, 0.863-1).

conclusionImmediate PET/CT accurately predicts the success of liver metastasis ablation at 1 y and is superior to immediate enhanced CT.

Indexed as

Fluorodeoxyglucose F18RadiopharmaceuticalsAdultAgedBiomarkersFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansLiver NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalPositron-Emission TomographyPositron Emission Tomography Computed TomographyRadiology, InterventionalReproducibility of ResultsBiomarkersFluorodeoxyglucose F18Radiopharmaceuticalsimaging biomarkersinterventional radiologyPET/CTthermal ablationtreatment failure

Identifiers

PMID26912433
PMCPMC5484796
OpenAlexW2286933630

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.