Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26912341›Full record

ArticleJournal of nanobiotechnology2016

Comparative in vitro toxicity of a graphene oxide-silver nanocomposite and the pristine counterparts toward macrophages.

Luis Augusto Visani de Luna, Ana Carolina Mazarin de Moraes, Sílvio Roberto Consonni, Catarinie Diniz Pereira, Solange Cadore, Selma Giorgio, Oswaldo Luiz Alves

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of nanobiotechnology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 22 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
22citing papers in PubMed
6.1field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

22 citing papers in PubMed, 77 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Luis Augusto Visani de LunaLaboratory of Solid State Chemistry (LQES), Institute of Chemistry, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil. luisvisani@gmail.com.
Ana Carolina Mazarin de MoraesLaboratory of Solid State Chemistry (LQES), Institute of Chemistry, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil. anacmmo@gmail.com.
Sílvio Roberto ConsonniBrazilian Biosciences National Laboratory (LNBio), Brazilian Center for Research in Energy and Materials (CNPEM), Campinas, Brazil. silviorconsonni@yahoo.com.br.
Catarinie Diniz PereiraAtomic Spectrometry Group (GEAtom), Institute of Chemistry, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil. catarinie.dp@gmail.com.
Solange CadoreAtomic Spectrometry Group (GEAtom), Institute of Chemistry, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil. cadore@iqm.unicamp.br.
Selma GiorgioLaboratory of Leishmaniasis (Lableish), Institute of Biology, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil. selmagiorgio@gmail.com.
Oswaldo Luiz AlvesLaboratory of Solid State Chemistry (LQES), Institute of Chemistry, University of Campinas, Campinas, Brazil. oalves@iqm.unicamp.br.
Universidade Estadual de Campinas (UNICAMP) · BR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundGraphene oxide (GO) is a highly oxidized graphene form with oxygen functional groups on its surface. GO is an excellent platform to support and stabilize silver nanoparticles (AgNP), which gives rise to the graphene oxide-silver nanoparticle (GOAg) nanocomposite. Understanding how this nanocomposite interacts with cells is a toxicological challenge of great importance for future biomedical applications, and macrophage cells can provide information concerning the biocompatibility of these nanomaterials. The cytotoxicity of the GOAg nanocomposite, pristine GO, and pristine AgNP was compared toward two representative murine macrophages: a tumoral lineage (J774) and peritoneal macrophages collected from Balb/c mouse. The production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) by J774 macrophages was also monitored. We investigated the internalization of nanomaterials by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The quantification of internalized silver was carried out by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS). Nanomaterial stability in the cell media was investigated overtime by visual observation, inductively coupled plasma optical emission spectrometry (ICP OES), and dynamic light scattering (DLS).

resultsThe GOAg nanocomposite was more toxic than pristine GO and pristine AgNP for both macrophages, and it significantly induced more ROS production compared to pristine AgNP. TEM analysis showed that GOAg was internalized by tumoral J774 macrophages. However, macrophages internalized approximately 60 % less GOAg than did pristine AgNP. The images also showed the degradation of nanocomposite inside cells.

conclusionsAlthough the GOAg nanocomposite was less internalized by the macrophage cells, it was more toxic than the pristine counterparts and induced remarkable oxidative stress. Our findings strongly reveal a synergistic toxicity effect of the GOAg nanocomposite. The toxicity and fate of nanocomposites in cells are some of the major concerns in the development of novel biocompatible materials and must be carefully evaluated.

Indexed as

AnimalsBiocompatible MaterialsCell Line, TumorFullerenesGraphiteMacrophagesMetal NanoparticlesMiceMice, Inbred BALB CNanocompositesOxidesReactive Oxygen SpeciesSilverBiocompatible MaterialsFullerenesGraphiteOxidespristine (C60)Reactive Oxygen SpeciesSilver

Identifiers

PMID26912341
PMCPMC4765018
OpenAlexW2276121356

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.