ArticleJMIR medical informatics2016
Conceptual Models in Health Informatics Research: A Literature Review and Suggestions for Development.
Article in JMIR medical informatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Improving quality of care through patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs): expert interviews using the NHS PROMs Programme and the Swedish quality registers for knee and hip arthroplasty as examples.BMC health services research · 2018Pooled it
- The International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) in Electronic Health Records. A Systematic Literature Review.Applied clinical informatics · 2017Pooled it
- Logic Models on Health Information Technology-Related Interventions: Scoping Review Across Disciplines.JMIR medical informatics · 2026Article
- Development and evaluation of a clinical dashboard for nephrology inpatients: a pilot study.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Scientometric analysis of telerehabilitation services for cerebral palsy patients: A comprehensive review and research trends mapping.Journal of education and health promotion · 2025Article
- Use of the FallAkte Plus System as an IT Infrastructure for the North Rhine-Westphalian General Practice Research Network: Mixed Methods Usability Study.JMIR formative research · 2024Article
- Health Related Social Needs Screening and Referral Fulfillment: Toward a Complex Model.AMIA ... Annual Symposium proceedings. AMIA Symposium · 2024Article
- COVID-19 Conceptual Modeling: Single-Center Cross-Sectional Study.JMIR formative research · 2023Article
- The pursuit of health equity in digital transformation, health informatics, and the cardiovascular learning healthcare system.American heart journal plus : cardiology research and practice · 2022Article
- Assessing Health Data Security Risks in Global Health Partnerships: Development of a Conceptual Framework.JMIR formative research · 2021Article
- Automating Quality Measures for Heart Failure Using Natural Language Processing: A Descriptive Study in the Department of Veterans Affairs.JMIR medical informatics · 2018Article
- Research Strategies for Biomedical and Health Informatics. Some Thought-provoking and Critical Proposals to Encourage Scientific Debate on the Nature of Good Research in Medical Informatics.Methods of information in medicine · 2017Article
- The Quantified Brain: A Framework for Mobile Device-Based Assessment of Behavior and Neurological Function.Applied clinical informatics · 2016Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundContributing to health informatics research means using conceptual models that are integrative and explain the research in terms of the two broad domains of health science and information science. However, it can be hard for novice health informatics researchers to find exemplars and guidelines in working with integrative conceptual models.
objectivesThe aim of this paper is to support the use of integrative conceptual models in research on information and communication technologies in the health sector, and to encourage discussion of these conceptual models in scholarly forums.
methodsA two-part method was used to summarize and structure ideas about how to work effectively with conceptual models in health informatics research that included (1) a selective review and summary of the literature of conceptual models; and (2) the construction of a step-by-step approach to developing a conceptual model.
resultsThe seven-step methodology for developing conceptual models in health informatics research explained in this paper involves (1) acknowledging the limitations of health science and information science conceptual models; (2) giving a rationale for one's choice of integrative conceptual model; (3) explicating a conceptual model verbally and graphically; (4) seeking feedback about the conceptual model from stakeholders in both the health science and information science domains; (5) aligning a conceptual model with an appropriate research plan; (6) adapting a conceptual model in response to new knowledge over time; and (7) disseminating conceptual models in scholarly and scientific forums.
conclusionsMaking explicit the conceptual model that underpins a health informatics research project can contribute to increasing the number of well-formed and strongly grounded health informatics research projects. This explication has distinct benefits for researchers in training, research teams, and researchers and practitioners in information, health, and other disciplines.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.