ArticleInternational journal for equity in health2016
Patterns of pharmaceutical use for immigrants to Spain and Norway: a comparative study of prescription databases in two European countries.
Article in International journal for equity in health, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
15 citing papers in PubMed.
- Antibiotic treatment for respiratory tract infections for migrants in Norway during the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-wide registry study.BMC primary care · 2026Observational
- Therapy, Pills and Unmet Needs for Financial Reasons: Socioeconomic Inequalities and Inequities in Access to Mental Health Care in Spain 2014-2020.Applied health economics and health policy · 2025Article
- Use of benzodiazepine and related drugs in migrants and Finnish-born persons: a nationwide register-based study.Scandinavian journal of public health · 2023Article
- Prescription Drug and Cannabis Use among Recent Latinx Immigrants Pre- and Post-Immigration to the US.Substance use & misuse · 2022Article
- Health Problems and the Use of Medications and Traditional Therapies among Chinese Immigrants Living in Spain.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021Article
- Factors Associated with Buying Medications Abroad by Nativity and Race/Ethnicity in the US.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2020Article
- Effectiveness of risk minimization measures for the use of cilostazol in United Kingdom, Spain, Sweden, and Germany.Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety · 2018Observational
- Factors Associated to Medication Consumption Among the Immigrant Population Residing in Spain.Journal of immigrant and minority health · 2018Article
- Cohort Profile: The Epidemiology of Chronic Diseases and Multimorbidity. The EpiChron Cohort Study.International journal of epidemiology · 2018Article
- Health care curricula in multicultural societies.International journal of medical education · 2018Article
- Dispensing of psychotropic medication among 400,000 immigrants in The Netherlands.Social psychiatry and psychiatric epidemiology · 2017Article
- Interventions to improve immigrant health. A scoping review.European journal of public health · 2017Article
- Determinants of Health Care Services Utilization among First Generation Afghan Migrants in Istanbul.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2017Article
- Global healthcare use by immigrants in Spain according to morbidity burden, area of origin, and length of stay.BMC public health · 2016Article
- A systematic review of the use of health services by immigrants and native populations.Public health reviewsReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundAlthough equity in health care is theoretically a cornerstone in Western societies, several studies show that services do not always provide equitable care for immigrants. Differences in pharmaceutical consumption between immigrants and natives are explained by variances in predisposing factors, enabling factors and needs across populations, and can be used as a proxy of disparities in health care use. By comparing the relative differences in pharmacological use between natives and immigrants from the same four countries of origin living in Spain and Norway respectively, this article presents a new approach to the study of inequity in health care.
methodsAll purchased drug prescriptions classified according to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) system in Aragon (Spain) and Norway for a total of 5 million natives and nearly 100,000 immigrants for one calendar year were included in this cross-sectional study. Age and gender adjusted relative purchase rates for immigrants from Poland, China, Colombia and Morocco compared to native populations in each of the host countries were calculated. Direct standardisation was performed based on the 2009 population structure of the OECD countries.
resultsOverall, a significantly lower proportion of immigrants in Aragon (Spain) and Norway purchased pharmacological drugs compared to natives. Patterns of use across the different immigrant groups were consistent in both host countries, despite potential disparities between the Spanish and Norwegian health care systems. Immigrants from Morocco showed the highest drug use rates in relation to natives, especially for antidepressants, "pain killers" and drugs for peptic ulcer. Immigrants from China and Poland showed the lowest use rates, while Colombians where more similar to host countries.
conclusionsThe similarities found between the two European countries in relation to immigrants' pharmaceutical use disregarding their host country emphasises the need to consider specific immigrant-related features when planning and providing healthcare services to this part of the population. These results somehow remove the focus on inequity as the main reason to explain differences in purchase between immigrants and natives.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.