Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26912187›Full record

ArticleMedicine, health care, and philosophy2016

Medicalization and overdiagnosis: different but alike.

Bjørn Hofmann

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
32citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

32 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Conceptual scaffolding for the philosophy of medicine.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Kairos in diagnostics.Theoretical medicine and bioethics · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Psychology's medicalization of male baldness.Journal of health psychology · 2022
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Overdiagnosis: one concept, three perspectives, and a model.European journal of epidemiology · 2021
    Article
  15. Review
  16. Concept Creep and Psychiatrization.Frontiers in sociology · 2021
    Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. A typology of clinical conditions.Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences · 2020
    Article
  20. Medicalization Defined in Empirical Contexts - A Scoping Review.International journal of health policy and management · 2020
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

Bjørn HofmannThe Centre of Medical Ethics, University of Oslo, PO Box 1130, Blindern, 0318, Oslo, Norway. b.m.hofmann@medisin.uio.no.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Medicalization is frequently defined as a process by which some non-medical aspects of human life become to be considered as medical problems. Overdiagnosis, on the other hand, is most often defined as diagnosing a biomedical condition that in the absence of testing would not cause symptoms or death in the person's lifetime. Medicalization and overdiagnosis are related concepts as both expand the extension of the concept of disease. They are both often used normatively to critique unwarranted or contested expansion of medicine and to address health services that are considered to be unnecessary, futile, or even harmful. However, there are important differences between the concepts, as not all cases of overdiagnosis are medicalizations and not all cases of medicalizations are overdiagnosis. The objective of this article is to clarify the differences between medicalization and overdiagnosis. It will demonstrate how the subject matter of medicalization traditionally has been non-medical (social or cultural everyday life) phenomena, while the subject matter of overdiagnosis has been biological or biomolecular conditions or processes acknowledged being potentially harmful. They also refer to different types of uncertainty: medicalization is concerned with indeterminacy, while overdiagnosis is concerned with lack of prognostic knowledge. Medicalization is dealing with sickness (sick role) while overdiagnosis with disease. Despite these differences, medicalization and overdiagnosis are becoming more alike. Medicalization is expanding, encompassing the more "technical" aspects of overdiagnosis, while overdiagnosis is becoming more ideologized. Moreover, with new trends in modern medicine, such as P4 (preventive, predictive, personal, and participatory) medicine, medicalization will become all-encompassing, while overdiagnosis more or less may dissolve. In the end they may converge in some total "iatrogenization." In doing so, the concepts may lose their precision and critical sting.

Indexed as

MedicalizationMedical OveruseDiseaseHumansUnnecessary ProceduresFutileIdeologyMedicalizationOverdiagnosisScienceUnnecessary

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.