ArticleMedicine, health care, and philosophy2016
Medicalization and overdiagnosis: different but alike.
Article in Medicine, health care, and philosophy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 32 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
32 citing papers in PubMed.
- Ontological deskilling: clinical expertise and the changing disease object in precision medicine.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2026Article
- Precision prevention and the temporal disruption of evidence: the case of heart rate notifications from wearables.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2026Article
- Psychiatrists' opinions about non-medicalization of cannabis use disorder in Iran.Discover mental health · 2025Article
- A problematic view of peer review; the epistemic distance of medical humanities with medicine.Journal of diabetes and metabolic disorders · 2025Article
- Conceptual scaffolding for the philosophy of medicine.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2025Article
- Discourses leading to diagnostic excess: an ethnopsychological study in Italian schools.Frontiers in psychology · 2025Article
- [Experiences and subjective transformations: suffering and coercion in the use of psychotropic drugs in psychiatric treatment in Chile].Salud colectiva · 2024Article
- Article
- Why we should not "help bad choosers:" screening, nudging, and epistemic risk.Medicine, health care, and philosophy · 2024Article
- Kairos in diagnostics.Theoretical medicine and bioethics · 2024Article
- Managing the moral expansion of medicine.BMC medical ethics · 2022Article
- Psychology's medicalization of male baldness.Journal of health psychology · 2022Review
- Too Much, Too Mild, Too Early: Diagnosing the Excessive Expansion of Diagnoses.International journal of general medicine · 2022Article
- Overdiagnosis: one concept, three perspectives, and a model.European journal of epidemiology · 2021Article
- What is a mental disorder? An exemplar-focused approach.Psychological medicine · 2021Review
- Concept Creep and Psychiatrization.Frontiers in sociology · 2021Review
- The Pitfalls of Overtreatment: Why More Care is not Necessarily Beneficial.Asian bioethics review · 2020Article
- Prevention in the age of personal responsibility: epigenetic risk-predictive screening for female cancers as a case study.Journal of medical ethics · 2020Article
- A typology of clinical conditions.Studies in history and philosophy of biological and biomedical sciences · 2020Article
- Medicalization Defined in Empirical Contexts - A Scoping Review.International journal of health policy and management · 2020Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Medicalization is frequently defined as a process by which some non-medical aspects of human life become to be considered as medical problems. Overdiagnosis, on the other hand, is most often defined as diagnosing a biomedical condition that in the absence of testing would not cause symptoms or death in the person's lifetime. Medicalization and overdiagnosis are related concepts as both expand the extension of the concept of disease. They are both often used normatively to critique unwarranted or contested expansion of medicine and to address health services that are considered to be unnecessary, futile, or even harmful. However, there are important differences between the concepts, as not all cases of overdiagnosis are medicalizations and not all cases of medicalizations are overdiagnosis. The objective of this article is to clarify the differences between medicalization and overdiagnosis. It will demonstrate how the subject matter of medicalization traditionally has been non-medical (social or cultural everyday life) phenomena, while the subject matter of overdiagnosis has been biological or biomolecular conditions or processes acknowledged being potentially harmful. They also refer to different types of uncertainty: medicalization is concerned with indeterminacy, while overdiagnosis is concerned with lack of prognostic knowledge. Medicalization is dealing with sickness (sick role) while overdiagnosis with disease. Despite these differences, medicalization and overdiagnosis are becoming more alike. Medicalization is expanding, encompassing the more "technical" aspects of overdiagnosis, while overdiagnosis is becoming more ideologized. Moreover, with new trends in modern medicine, such as P4 (preventive, predictive, personal, and participatory) medicine, medicalization will become all-encompassing, while overdiagnosis more or less may dissolve. In the end they may converge in some total "iatrogenization." In doing so, the concepts may lose their precision and critical sting.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26912187What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.