Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26911987›Full record

ArticleOrphanet journal of rare diseases2016

The context for the thematic grouping of rare diseases to facilitate the establishment of European Reference Networks.

Teresinha Evangelista, Victoria Hedley, Antonio Atalaia, Matt Johnson, Stephen Lynn, Yann Le Cam, Kate Bushby

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 21 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
21citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

21 citing papers in PubMed, 45 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. European multidisciplinary tumor boards support cross-border networking and increase treatment options for patients with rare gynecological tumors.International journal of gynecological cancer : official journal of the International Gynecological Cancer Society · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. The Burden of Spinal Muscular Atrophy on Informal Caregivers.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2020
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Teresinha EvangelistaJohn Walton Muscular Dystrophy Research Centre and MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 3BZ, UK. teresinha.evangelista@ncl.ac.uk.
Victoria HedleyJohn Walton Muscular Dystrophy Research Centre and MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 3BZ, UK. Victoria.hedley@ncl.ac.uk.
Antonio AtalaiaJohn Walton Muscular Dystrophy Research Centre and MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 3BZ, UK. Antonio.atalaia@ncl.ac.uk.
Matt JohnsonEuropean Organisation for Rare Diseases (EURORDIS), Paris, France. matt.johnson@eurordis.org.
Stephen LynnJohn Walton Muscular Dystrophy Research Centre and MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 3BZ, UK. steven.lynn@ncl.ac.uk.
Yann Le CamEuropean Organisation for Rare Diseases (EURORDIS), Paris, France. Yann.lecam@eurordis.org.
Kate BushbyJohn Walton Muscular Dystrophy Research Centre and MRC Centre for Neuromuscular Diseases, Institute of Genetic Medicine, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 3BZ, UK. kate.bushby@ncl.ac.uk.
Newcastle University · GBEuropean Organisation for Rare Diseases · FR

Funding

Medical Research Council G1002274Medical Research Council G1002274, grant ID 98482
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIn the past few years there has been a political imperative driving the creation of European Reference Networks as these are considered a promising way to achieve equity in access to the most up to date medical care across Europe. The right to equity in the access to care was established by the directive of the European Parliament and of the Council on the application of patients' rights in cross-border healthcare. The particular situation for Rare Diseases whereby sharing of expertise can be regarded as especially valuable, as well as the work that is already in place in the networking of Rare Diseases experts means that Rare Diseases are considered excellent models for the development of European Reference Networks. DISCUSSION: To be effective, a Rare Disease network should be based on the common effort of different stakeholders and be built on what is present in the community. European Reference Networks are an excellent model to overcome some of the specificities of rare diseases: scarcity of patients, resources and expertise. European Reference Networks with broad scope will allow the rare disease community the possibility of reaching a larger number of patients and more diversified rare diseases. The practical value of grouping rare diseases in broad networks is well demonstrated in different grouping systems present in Europe (EURORDIS grouping of diseases, "Les filières de santé maladies rares", Orphanet classification and the UK Research Model). In this paper the authors, partners of EUCERD Joint Action, address some of the questions that surround the establishment of European Reference Networks. We will focus on how Rare Diseases could be efficiently grouped in order to constitute European Reference Networks and how they might be structured to allow each and every disease to benefit from networking.

Indexed as

Databases, FactualDelivery of Health CareEuropeHumansRare Diseases

Identifiers

PMID26911987
PMCPMC4765230
OpenAlexW2280000445

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.