Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26911824›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA2016

Data interchange using i2b2.

Jeffrey G Klann, Aaron Abend, Vijay A Raghavan, Kenneth D Mandl, Shawn N Murphy

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association : JAMIA, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 52 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
52citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

52 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical Research Informatics: a Decade-in-Review.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2024
    Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Technologies to Study Genetics and Molecular Pathways.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2024
    Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jeffrey G KlannPartners Healthcare, Boston, MA, USA Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA jeff.klann@mgh.harvard.edu.
Aaron AbendThe Autoimmune Registry, New York, NY, USA.
Vijay A RaghavanHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA.
Kenneth D MandlHarvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Boston Children's Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.
Shawn N MurphyPartners Healthcare, Boston, MA, USA Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA, USA.

Funding

Instrumenting i2b2 for Improved Medication Research: Adding the Patient VoiceR01GM104303 · NIGMS · BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL · PI MANDL, KENNETH D. · 2013 to 2016
$1.6M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM104303
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveReinventing data extraction from electronic health records (EHRs) to meet new analytical needs is slow and expensive. However, each new data research network that wishes to support its own analytics tends to develop its own data model. Joining these different networks without new data extraction, transform, and load (ETL) processes can reduce the time and expense needed to participate. The Informatics for Integrating Biology and the Bedside (i2b2) project supports data network interoperability through an ontology-driven approach. We use i2b2 as a hub, to rapidly reconfigure data to meet new analytical requirements without new ETL programming. MATERIALS AND

methodsOur 12-site National Patient-Centered Clinical Research Network (PCORnet) Clinical Data Research Network (CDRN) uses i2b2 to query data. We developed a process to generate a PCORnet Common Data Model (CDM) physical database directly from existing i2b2 systems, thereby supporting PCORnet analytic queries without new ETL programming. This involved: a formalized process for representing i2b2 information models (the specification of data types and formats); an information model that represents CDM Version 1.0; and a program that generates CDM tables, driven by this information model. This approach is generalizable to any logical information model.

resultsEight PCORnet CDRN sites have implemented this approach and generated a CDM database without a new ETL process from the EHR. This enables federated querying within the CDRN and compatibility with the national PCORnet Distributed Research Network. DISCUSSION: We have established a way to adapt i2b2 to new information models without requiring changes to the underlying data. Eight Scalable Collaborative Infrastructure for a Learning Health System sites vetted this methodology, resulting in a network that, at present, supports research on 10 million patients' data.

conclusionNew analytical requirements can be quickly and cost-effectively supported by i2b2 without creating new data extraction processes from the EHR.

Indexed as

Biomedical ResearchDatabases, FactualHealth Information InteroperabilityInformation DisseminationData MiningElectronic Health RecordsHumansInformation Storage and Retrievaldata integrationdata modelsinformatics for integrating biology and the bedsidemedical informaticsontology-driven data representationpatient centered outcomes research institutePCORnet CDM

Identifiers

PMID26911824
PMCPMC4997035

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.