Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26911787›Full record

ReviewNeurobiology of learning and memory2016

What do phasic cholinergic signals do?

Martin Sarter, Cindy Lustig, Anne S Berry, Howard Gritton, William M Howe, Vinay Parikh

Open access · greenAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Neurobiology of learning and memory, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 37 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
37citing papers in PubMed
6.0field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

37 citing papers in PubMed, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Make a Left Turn: Cortico-Striatal Circuitry Mediating the Attentional Control of Complex Movements.Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society · 2021
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Forebrain Cholinergic Signaling: Wired and Phasic, Not Tonic, and Causing Behavior.The Journal of neuroscience : the official journal of the Society for Neuroscience · 2020
    Review
  17. Cholinergic Signaling Dynamics and Cognitive Control of Attention.Current topics in behavioral neurosciences · 2020
    Review
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 4 institutions in 1 country.

Martin SarterUniversity of Michigan, Dept. of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, Ann Arbor, MI, United States. Electronic address: msarter@umich.edu.
Cindy LustigUniversity of Michigan, Dept. of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, Ann Arbor, MI, United States. Electronic address: clustig@umich.edu.
Anne S BerryLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, CA, United States.
Howard GrittonBoston University, Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Boston, MA, United States.
William M HoweBoston University, Dept. of Biomedical Engineering, Boston, MA, United States; Pfizer Neuroscience, Cambridge, MA, United States.
Vinay ParikhTemple University, Dept. of Psychology and Neuroscience Program, Philadelphia, PA, United States.
Boston University · USUniversity of Michigan–Ann Arbor · USLawrence Berkeley National Laboratory · USTemple University · US

Funding

Public Outreach and Education CoreP50NS091856 · NINDS · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ALBIN, ROGER L · 2014 to 2019
$10.1M
Variation in Motivational Properties of Reward Cues: Implications for AddictionP01DA031656 · NIDA · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI ROBINSON, TERRY E. · 2012 to 2016
$6.3M
Choline transporter capacity limits motivated behavior on mice, rats, and humansR01MH086530 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI SARTER, MARTIN F · 2010 to 2014
$1.9M
NIDA NIH HHS DA031656NIDA NIH HHS P01 DA031656NIMH NIH HHS MH086530NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH086530NINDS NIH HHS NS091856NINDS NIH HHS P50 NS091856
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In addition to the neuromodulatory role of cholinergic systems, brief, temporally discrete cholinergic release events, or "transients", have been associated with the detection of cues in attention tasks. Here we review four main findings about cholinergic transients during cognitive processing. Cholinergic transients are: (1) associated with the detection of a cue and influenced by cognitive state; (2) not dependent on reward outcome, although the timing of the transient peak co-varies with the temporal relationship between detection and reward delivery; (3) correlated with the mobilization of the cue-evoked response; (4) causal mediators of shifts from monitoring to cue detection. We next discuss some of the key questions concerning the timing and occurrence of transients within the framework of available evidence including: (1) Why does the shift from monitoring to cue detection require a transient? (2) What determines whether a cholinergic transient will be generated? (3) How can cognitive state influence transient occurrence? (4) Why do cholinergic transients peak at around the time of reward delivery? (5) Is there evidence of cholinergic transients in humans? We conclude by outlining future research studies necessary to more fully understand the role of cholinergic transients in mediating cue detection.

Indexed as

AcetylcholineAnimalsAttentionBrainCholinergic NeuronsCognitionCuesHumansRewardAcetylcholineAcetylcholineAttentionCognitionCortex

Identifiers

PMID26911787
PMCPMC4818703
OpenAlexW2286740000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.