Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26911656›Full record

ArticleJournal of public health policy2016

Education versus regulation: The case for regulating the indoor tanning industry.

Suzeanne Benet, Frederic Kraft

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of public health policy, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Suzeanne BenetDepartment of Marketing, Grand Valley State University, L. William Seidman Center 3112, 50 Front Ave SW, Grand Rapids, MI 49504, USA.
Frederic KraftDepartment of Marketing, Grand Valley State University, L. William Seidman Center 3112, 50 Front Ave SW, Grand Rapids, MI 49504, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

We examine marketing strategies for indoor tanning services that often target young adult females. Evidence of the addictive nature of indoor tanning suggests that young adults may be vulnerable to the promotion of indoor tanning and as a result deserve greater protection from the marketing of these services. As public awareness of the rising numbers of skin cancers linked to indoor tanning grows, we believe that the public will support increased regulation of this industry.

Indexed as

Health EducationAdvertisingBehavior, AddictiveFemaleHumansIndustryMaleSkin NeoplasmsSunbathingYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID26911656

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.