ArticleBMC bioinformatics2016
Sparse regressions for predicting and interpreting subcellular localization of multi-label proteins.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed.
- A comprehensive review on RNA subcellular localization prediction.Briefings in functional genomics · 2026Review
- A Review for Artificial Intelligence Based Protein Subcellular Localization.Biomolecules · 2024Review
- DeepLoc 2.0: multi-label subcellular localization prediction using protein language models.Nucleic acids research · 2022Article
- Improved cancer biomarkers identification using network-constrained infinite latent feature selection.PloS one · 2021Article
- Self-evoluting framework of deep convolutional neural network for multilocus protein subcellular localization.Medical & biological engineering & computing · 2020Article
- Article
- Use of Chou's 5-steps rule to predict the subcellular localization of gram-negative and gram-positive bacterial proteins by multi-label learning based on gene ontology annotation and profile alignment.Journal of integrative bioinformatics · 2020Article
- Identifying essential proteins in dynamic protein networks based on an improved h-index algorithm.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2020Article
- Learning important features from multi-view data to predict drug side effects.Journal of cheminformatics · 2019Article
- MIC_Locator: a novel image-based protein subcellular location multi-label prediction model based on multi-scale monogenic signal representation and intensity encoding strategy.BMC bioinformatics · 2019Article
- A New Method for Recognizing Cytokines Based on Feature Combination and a Support Vector Machine Classifier.Molecules (Basel, Switzerland) · 2018Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundPredicting protein subcellular localization is indispensable for inferring protein functions. Recent studies have been focusing on predicting not only single-location proteins, but also multi-location proteins. Almost all of the high performing predictors proposed recently use gene ontology (GO) terms to construct feature vectors for classification. Despite their high performance, their prediction decisions are difficult to interpret because of the large number of GO terms involved.
resultsThis paper proposes using sparse regressions to exploit GO information for both predicting and interpreting subcellular localization of single- and multi-location proteins. Specifically, we compared two multi-label sparse regression algorithms, namely multi-label LASSO (mLASSO) and multi-label elastic net (mEN), for large-scale predictions of protein subcellular localization. Both algorithms can yield sparse and interpretable solutions. By using the one-vs-rest strategy, mLASSO and mEN identified 87 and 429 out of more than 8,000 GO terms, respectively, which play essential roles in determining subcellular localization. More interestingly, many of the GO terms selected by mEN are from the biological process and molecular function categories, suggesting that the GO terms of these categories also play vital roles in the prediction. With these essential GO terms, not only where a protein locates can be decided, but also why it resides there can be revealed.
conclusionsExperimental results show that the output of both mEN and mLASSO are interpretable and they perform significantly better than existing state-of-the-art predictors. Moreover, mEN selects more features and performs better than mLASSO on a stringent human benchmark dataset. For readers' convenience, an online server called SpaPredictor for both mLASSO and mEN is available at http://bioinfo.eie.polyu.edu.hk/SpaPredictorServer/.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.