Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26911429›Full record

ArticleBiology of reproduction2016

Next Generation Sequencing-Based Comprehensive Chromosome Screening in Mouse Polar Bodies, Oocytes, and Embryos.

Nathan R Treff, Rebecca L Krisher, Xin Tao, Heather Garnsey, Chelsea Bohrer, Elena Silva, Jessica Landis, Deanne Taylor, Richard T Scott, Teresa K Woodruff and 1 more

Open access · bronzeAbstract readEvaluation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Biology of reproduction, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 26 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
26citing papers in PubMed
11.8field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

26 citing papers in PubMed, 39 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Clinical medicine insights. Reproductive health · 2019
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Nathan R TreffDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey, Basking Ridge, New Jersey Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey ntreff@rmanj.com.
Rebecca L KrisherNational Foundation for Fertility Research, Lone Tree, Colorado.
Xin TaoDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey, Basking Ridge, New Jersey.
Heather GarnseyDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey, Basking Ridge, New Jersey.
Chelsea BohrerDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey, Basking Ridge, New Jersey.
Elena SilvaNational Foundation for Fertility Research, Lone Tree, Colorado.
Jessica LandisDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey, Basking Ridge, New Jersey Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Deanne TaylorDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey, Basking Ridge, New Jersey Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Richard T ScottDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Reproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey, Basking Ridge, New Jersey Rutgers-Robert Wood Johnson Medical School, New Brunswick, New Jersey.
Teresa K WoodruffDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, Chicago, Illinois.
Francesca E DuncanDepartment of Anatomy and Cell Biology, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas fduncan@kumc.edu.
Johnson University · USReproductive Medicine Associates of New Jersey · USNational Foundation for Fertility Research · USNorthwestern University · USRutgers, The State University of New Jersey · USUniversity of Kansas Medical Center · US

Funding

Transgenic and Gener-Targeting CoreP20GM104936 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF KANSAS MEDICAL CENTER · PI SAADI, IRFAN · 2012 to 2016
$10.9M
Project 3: Medically-based Protection of the Ovarian Reserve Against Anti-CancerP50HD076188 · NICHD · NORTHWESTERN UNIVERSITY AT CHICAGO · PI WOODRUFF, TERESA K · 2014 to 2017
$6.2M
NICHD NIH HHS P50 HD076188NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM104936
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Advanced reproductive age is unequivocally associated with increased aneuploidy in human oocytes, which contributes to infertility, miscarriages, and birth defects. The frequency of meiotic chromosome segregation errors in oocytes derived from reproductively aged mice appears to be similar to that observed in humans, but a limitation of this important model system is our inability to accurately identify chromosome-specific aneuploidy. Here we report the validation and application of a new low-pass whole-genome sequencing approach to comprehensively screen chromosome aneuploidy in individual mouse oocytes and blastocysts. First, we validated this approach by using single mouse embryonic fibroblasts engineered to have stable trisomy 16. We further validated this method by identifying reciprocal chromosome segregation errors in the products of meiosis I (gamete and polar body) in oocytes from reproductively aged mice. Finally, we applied this technology to investigate the incidence of aneuploidy in blastocysts derived from in vitro- and in vivo-matured oocytes in both young and reproductively aged mice. Using this next generation sequencing approach, we quantitatively assessed meiotic and mitotic segregation errors at the single chromosome level, distinguished between errors due to premature separation of sister chromatids and classical nondisjunction of homologous chromosomes, and quantified mitochondrial DNA (mtDNA) segregation in individual cells. This whole-genome sequencing technique, therefore, greatly improves the utility of the mouse model system for the study of aneuploidy and is a powerful quantitative tool with which to examine the molecular underpinnings of mammalian gamete and early embryo chromosome segregation in the context of reproductive aging and beyond.

Indexed as

AnimalsBlastocystCell LineChromosomes, Human, Pair 16DNA Copy Number VariationsDNA, MitochondrialEmbryo, MammalianFemaleGenetic TestingMaleMiceMosaicismNondisjunction, GeneticOocytesPolar BodiesSequence Analysis, DNADNA, Mitochondrialaginganeuploidyembryooocytewhole-genome sequencing

Identifiers

PMID26911429
PMCPMC5974929
OpenAlexW2275039396

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.