Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26911406›Full record

SynthesisThe oncologist2016

Candidate Predictors of Health-Related Quality of Life of Colorectal Cancer Survivors: A Systematic Review.

Martijn J L Bours, Bernadette W A van der Linden, Renate M Winkels, Fränzel J van Duijnhoven, Floortje Mols, Eline H van Roekel, Ellen Kampman, Sandra Beijer, Matty P Weijenberg

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in The oncologist, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 44 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
44citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

44 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Anxiety after completion of treatment for early-stage breast cancer: a systematic review to identify candidate predictors and evaluate multivariable model development.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2017
    Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Sexual minority-specific experiences of colorectal cancer survivors.Health psychology : official journal of the Division of Health Psychology, American Psychological Association · 2022
    Article
  19. Article
  20. Anxiety, depression, health-related quality of life, and mortality among colorectal patients: 5-year follow-up.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2022
    Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Martijn J L BoursDepartment of Epidemiology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands m.bours@maastrichtuniversity.nl.
Bernadette W A van der LindenDepartment of Epidemiology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Renate M WinkelsDivision of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Fränzel J van DuijnhovenDivision of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands.
Floortje MolsDepartment of Medical and Clinical Psychology, Tilburg University, Tilburg, The Netherlands Netherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Netherlands Cancer Registry, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Eline H van RoekelDepartment of Epidemiology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Ellen KampmanDivision of Human Nutrition, Wageningen University, Wageningen, The Netherlands Department of Health Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands Department for Health Evidence, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands.
Sandra BeijerNetherlands Comprehensive Cancer Organization, Netherlands Cancer Registry, Eindhoven, The Netherlands.
Matty P WeijenbergDepartment of Epidemiology, GROW - School for Oncology and Developmental Biology, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

unlabelledThe population of colorectal cancer (CRC) survivors is growing and many survivors experience deteriorated health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in both early and late post-treatment phases. Identification of CRC survivors at risk for HRQoL deterioration can be improved by using prediction models. However, such models are currently not available for oncology practice. As a starting point for developing prediction models of HRQoL for CRC survivors, a comprehensive overview of potential candidate HRQoL predictors is necessary. Therefore, a systematic literature review was conducted to identify candidate predictors of HRQoL of CRC survivors. Original research articles on associations of biopsychosocial factors with HRQoL of CRC survivors were searched in PubMed, Embase, and Google Scholar. Two independent reviewers assessed eligibility and selected articles for inclusion (N = 53). Strength of evidence for candidate HRQoL predictors was graded according to predefined methodological criteria. The World Health Organization's International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF) was used to develop a biopsychosocial framework in which identified candidate HRQoL predictors were mapped across the main domains of the ICF: health condition, body structures and functions, activities, participation, and personal and environmental factors. The developed biopsychosocial ICF framework serves as a basis for selecting candidate HRQoL predictors, thereby providing conceptual guidance for developing comprehensive, evidence-based prediction models of HRQoL for CRC survivors. Such models are useful in clinical oncology practice to aid in identifying individual CRC survivors at risk for HRQoL deterioration and could also provide potential targets for a biopsychosocial intervention aimed at safeguarding the HRQoL of at-risk individuals. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: More and more people now survive a diagnosis of colorectal cancer. The quality of life of these cancer survivors is threatened by health problems persisting for years after diagnosis and treatment. Early identification of survivors at risk of experiencing low quality of life in the future is thus important for taking preventive measures. Clinical prediction models are tools that can help oncologists identify at-risk individuals. However, such models are currently not available for clinical oncology practice. This systematic review outlines candidate predictors of low quality of life of colorectal cancer survivors, providing a firm conceptual basis for developing prediction models.

Indexed as

PrognosisColorectal NeoplasmsDepressionHealth StatusHumansQuality of LifeSocial ClassSurveys and QuestionnairesSurvivorsCandidate predictorsColorectal cancer survivorsHealth-related quality of lifeInternational Classification of Functioning, Disability and HealthSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID26911406
PMCPMC4828113

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.