Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26910516›Full record

ArticleNeuroinformatics2016

Heterogeneous Optimization Framework: Reproducible Preprocessing of Multi-Spectral Clinical MRI for Neuro-Oncology Imaging Research.

Mikhail Milchenko, Abraham Z Snyder, Pamela LaMontagne, Joshua S Shimony, Tammie L Benzinger, Sarah Jost Fouke, Daniel S Marcus

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Neuroinformatics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
1.1field-weighted citation impact, top 22% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Sensor, Signal, and Imaging Informatics.Yearbook of medical informatics · 2017
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Mikhail MilchenkoNeuroinformatics Research Group, Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA. mmilch@wustl.edu.
Abraham Z SnyderNeuroinformatics Research Group, Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Pamela LaMontagneNeuroinformatics Research Group, Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Joshua S ShimonyNeuroinformatics Research Group, Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Tammie L BenzingerNeuroinformatics Research Group, Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Sarah Jost FoukeDepartment of Neurological Surgery, Swedish Medical Center, Seattle, WA, USA.
Daniel S MarcusNeuroinformatics Research Group, Department of Radiology, Washington University School of Medicine, St. Louis, MO, USA.
Washington University in St. Louis · USNeurological Surgery · US

Funding

BIRN RESOURCES FACILITATE THE PERSONALIZATION OF MALIGNANT BRAIN TUMORR01NS066905 · NINDS · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI FOUKE, SARAH JOST, MARCUS, DANIEL SCOTT · 2009 to 2013
$1.6M
NINDS NIH HHS R01 NS066905
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroimaging research often relies on clinically acquired magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) datasets that can originate from multiple institutions. Such datasets are characterized by high heterogeneity of modalities and variability of sequence parameters. This heterogeneity complicates the automation of image processing tasks such as spatial co-registration and physiological or functional image analysis. Given this heterogeneity, conventional processing workflows developed for research purposes are not optimal for clinical data. In this work, we describe an approach called Heterogeneous Optimization Framework (HOF) for developing image analysis pipelines that can handle the high degree of clinical data non-uniformity. HOF provides a set of guidelines for configuration, algorithm development, deployment, interpretation of results and quality control for such pipelines. At each step, we illustrate the HOF approach using the implementation of an automated pipeline for Multimodal Glioma Analysis (MGA) as an example. The MGA pipeline computes tissue diffusion characteristics of diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) acquisitions, hemodynamic characteristics using a perfusion model of susceptibility contrast (DSC) MRI, and spatial cross-modal co-registration of available anatomical, physiological and derived patient images. Developing MGA within HOF enabled the processing of neuro-oncology MR imaging studies to be fully automated. MGA has been successfully used to analyze over 160 clinical tumor studies to date within several research projects. Introduction of the MGA pipeline improved image processing throughput and, most importantly, effectively produced co-registered datasets that were suitable for advanced analysis despite high heterogeneity in acquisition protocols.

Indexed as

Magnetic Resonance ImagingAlgorithmsAtlases as TopicBrain MappingBrain NeoplasmsHumansImage Interpretation, Computer-AssistedMultimodal ImagingPattern Recognition, AutomatedReproducibility of ResultsSignal Processing, Computer-AssistedData modelingDiffusion imagingDSC imagingKnowledge representationMRINeuro-oncology imagingSpatial co-registration

Identifiers

PMID26910516
PMCPMC4899239
OpenAlexW2277903078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.