Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26910426›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2016

Dynamics of the Ligand Binding Domain Layer during AMPA Receptor Activation.

Jelena Baranovic, Miriam Chebli, Hector Salazar, Anna L Carbone, Katja Faelber, Albert Y Lau, Oliver Daumke, Andrew J R Plested

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Allosteric Competition and Inhibition in AMPA Receptors.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2023
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Gating modules of the AMPA receptor pore domain revealed by unnatural amino acid mutagenesis.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2019
    Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Jelena BaranovicLeibniz-Institut für Molekulare Pharmakologie, Berlin, Germany; Cluster of Excellence NeuroCure, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Miriam ChebliLeibniz-Institut für Molekulare Pharmakologie, Berlin, Germany; Cluster of Excellence NeuroCure, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Hector SalazarLeibniz-Institut für Molekulare Pharmakologie, Berlin, Germany; Cluster of Excellence NeuroCure, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Anna L CarboneLeibniz-Institut für Molekulare Pharmakologie, Berlin, Germany; Cluster of Excellence NeuroCure, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Katja FaelberDepartment of Crystallography, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany.
Albert Y LauDepartment of Biophysics and Biophysical Chemistry, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, Maryland.
Oliver DaumkeDepartment of Crystallography, Max Delbrück Center for Molecular Medicine, Berlin, Germany; Institute of Chemistry and Biochemistry, Freie Universität Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Andrew J R PlestedLeibniz-Institut für Molekulare Pharmakologie, Berlin, Germany; Cluster of Excellence NeuroCure, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Berlin, Germany. Electronic address: plested@fmp-berlin.de.
Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin · DELeibniz-Forschungsinstitut für Molekulare Pharmakologie · DEMax Delbrück Center · DEJohns Hopkins University · US

Funding

Structural dynamics and function of the glutamate receptor ligand-binding domainR01GM094495 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO · PI LAU, ALBERT Y · 2010 to 2013
$1.0M
NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM094495
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Ionotropic glutamate receptors are postsynaptic tetrameric ligand-gated channels whose activity mediates fast excitatory transmission. Glutamate binding to clamshell-shaped ligand binding domains (LBDs) triggers opening of the integral ion channel, but how the four LBDs orchestrate receptor activation is unknown. Here, we present a high-resolution x-ray crystal structure displaying two tetrameric LBD arrangements fully bound to glutamate. Using a series of engineered metal ion trapping mutants, we showed that the more compact of the two assemblies corresponds to an arrangement populated during activation of full-length receptors. State-dependent cross-linking of the mutants identified zinc bridges between the canonical active LBD dimers that formed when the tetramer was either fully or partially bound by glutamate. These bridges also stabilized the resting state, consistent with the recently published full-length apo structure. Our results provide insight into the activation mechanism of glutamate receptors and the complex conformational space that the LBD layer can sample.

Indexed as

AnimalsApoproteinsCrystallography, X-RayGlutamatesLigandsModels, MolecularMutationProtein DomainsProtein MultimerizationRatsReceptors, AMPAZincApoproteinsGlutamatesLigandsReceptors, AMPAZinc

Identifiers

PMID26910426
PMCPMC4776031
OpenAlexW2280988078

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.