ReviewDer Nervenarzt2016
[Acute and long-term cognitive consequences of treatment on intensive care units].
Review in Der Nervenarzt, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Delirium in psychiatric consultation services].Der Nervenarzt · 2025Review
- Structured Delirium Management in the Hospital.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2022Article
- [Competence, creativity and communication: basics for quality improvement in traumatology : Reality and future challenges].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2021Review
- [Challenges of discharge management in geriatric traumatology : Example of an integrated orthogeriatric service].Der Unfallchirurg · 2020Article
- Cognitive Deficits Following Intensive Care.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2019Review
- Take into Account Postoperative Cognitive Dysfunction.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2019Article
- Preoperative Screening Required.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2019Article
- [Predictors of cognitive outcome in ventilated early rehabilitation patients].Der Nervenarzt · 2017Observational
- Delirium as a Risk Factor for POCD.Deutsches Arzteblatt international · 2017Article
- [Traumatology in the elderly : Multimodal prevention of delirium and use of augmentation techniques].Der Chirurg; Zeitschrift fur alle Gebiete der operativen Medizen · 2017Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundFollowing treatment on the intensive care unit (ICU) patients often suffer from acute and long-term cognitive deficits. This is true for patients of all age groups but especially for elderly patients who have undergone surgery and develop postoperative delirium (POD) or postoperative cognitive decline (POCD). Both are associated with severe limitations in the quality of life and long-term outcome.
objectiveWhich acute and long-term cognitive effects develop in ICU survivors and how do they influence the outcome? How can POD and POCD be differentiated?
methodA selective literature search was carried out.
resultsFollowing surgery POCD can develop within days to weeks, may persist for weeks or months and can lead to problems in attentiveness even under conditions of inconspicuous consciousness. Remission is possible but may take up to more than 12 months. The POD is a phenomenon characterized by disturbances of consciousness and problems in attention, beginning acutely hours and days postoperatively, can persist for days to weeks and remission can be expected within a few days. While POD often has an organic cause, such as an infection, the pathogenesis of POCD has not been sufficiently elucidated. DISCUSSION: Both POD and particularly POCD can lead to a deterioration of cognition following ICU treatment. As efficient treatment still has to be developed preventive methods, such as preoperative screening for risk factors, thorough planning of operative and anesthetic techniques and compensation of risk factors as well as providing assistance to patients, e. g. by a trained nurse should be implemented in the clinical routine more often than is presently the case.
Indexed as
Identifiers
26910259What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.