Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26910255›Full record

ReviewSeminars in cell & developmental biology2016

Xenopus as a model organism for birth defects-Congenital heart disease and heterotaxy.

Anna R Duncan, Mustafa K Khokha

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Seminars in cell & developmental biology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 40 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
40citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

40 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Functional genomics iniScience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Tissue disaggregation and isolation of specific cell types from transgenic Xenopus appendages for transcriptional analysis by FACS.Developmental dynamics : an official publication of the American Association of Anatomists · 2021
    Article
  12. Journal of medical genetics · 2021
    Article
  13. Article
  14. Aquatic models of human ciliary diseases.Genesis (New York, N.Y. : 2000) · 2021
    Review
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Cold Spring Harbor perspectives in biology · 2020
    Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Anna R DuncanDepartment of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 3401 Civic Center Blvd, Philadelphia, PA 19104, United States.
Mustafa K KhokhaDepartment of Pediatrics and Genetics, Yale University School of Medicine, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT 06520, United States. Electronic address: mustafa.khokha@yale.edu.

Funding

New Mechanisms of Heterotaxy and Congenital Heart Disease: Nucleoporins at CiliaR01HL124402 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KHOKHA, MUSTAFA K, LUSK, CHARLES PATRICK · 2015 to 2022
$5.5M
A system approach to the analysis of Heterotaxy Candiate GenesR01HD081379 · NICHD · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI KHOKHA, MUSTAFA K · 2014 to 2018
$2.7M
Cardiac phenotyping of CHD candidate genes in XenopusR33HL120783 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI BRUECKNER, MARTINA, KHOKHA, MUSTAFA K · 2016 to 2018
$1.6M
Cardiac phenotyping of CHD candidate genes in XenopusR21HL120783 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI BRUECKNER, MARTINA, KHOKHA, MUSTAFA K · 2014 to 2015
$451k
NHLBI NIH HHS 4R33HL120783NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL124402NHLBI NIH HHS R01HL124402NHLBI NIH HHS R21 HL120783NHLBI NIH HHS R33 HL120783NICHD NIH HHS R01 HD081379NICHD NIH HHS R01HD081379
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Congenital heart disease is the leading cause of birth defects, affecting 9 out of 1000 newborns each year. A particularly severe form of congenital heart disease is heterotaxy, a disorder of left-right development. Despite aggressive surgical management, patients with heterotaxy have poor survival rates and severe morbidity due to their complex congenital heart disease. Recent genetic analysis of affected patients has found novel candidate genes for heterotaxy although their underlying mechanisms remain unknown. In this review, we discuss the importance and challenges of birth defects research including high locus heterogeneity and few second alleles that make defining disease causality difficult. A powerful strategy moving forward is to analyze these candidate genes in a high-throughput human disease model. Xenopus is ideal for these studies. We present multiple examples demonstrating the power of Xenopus in discovering new biology from the analysis of candidate heterotaxy genes such as GALNT11, NEK2 and BCOR. These genes have diverse roles in embryos and have led to a greater understanding of complex signaling pathways and basic developmental biology. It is our hope that the mechanistic analysis of these candidate genes in Xenopus enabled by next generation sequencing of patients will provide clinicians with a greater understanding of patient pathophysiology allowing more precise and personalized medicine, to help patients more effectively in the future.

Indexed as

Disease Models, AnimalAnimalsBody PatterningHeterotaxy SyndromeHumansMutationN-AcetylgalactosaminyltransferasesNIMA-Related KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsRepressor ProteinsXenopusXenopus ProteinsBCOR protein, humanGALNT11 protein, humanN-AcetylgalactosaminyltransferasesNEK2 protein, humanNIMA-Related KinasesProto-Oncogene ProteinsRepressor ProteinsXenopus ProteinsBCORCongenital heart diseaseDisease modelgalnt11HeterotaxyHuman geneticsnek2Xenopus

Identifiers

PMID26910255
PMCPMC4809202

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.