Innovative noninvasive hemodynamic monitoring: curb your enthusiasm after initial validation studies and evaluate the technologies' clinical applicability.

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

1. Study of the accuracy of a radial arterial pressure waveform cardiac output measurement device after cardiac surgery.Journal of cardiothoracic surgery · 2023
   Observational
2. The value of arterial pressure waveform cardiac output measurements in the radial and femoral artery in major cardiac surgery patients.BMC anesthesiology · 2017
   Article
3. Non-Invasive Hemodynamic Monitoring for Hemodynamic Management in Perioperative Medicine.Frontiers in medicine · 2017
   Article

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

Abstract

PubMed holds no abstract for this paper.

Indexed as