Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26909181›Full record

ArticleRoyal Society open science2016

Ants determine their next move at rest: motor planning and causality in complex systems.

Edmund R Hunt, Roland J Baddeley, Alan Worley, Ana B Sendova-Franks, Nigel R Franks

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Royal Society open science, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Building and Understanding the Minimal Self.Frontiers in psychology · 2021
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Optimal foraging and the information theory of gambling.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2019
    Article
  11. How ants move: individual and collective scaling properties.Journal of the Royal Society, Interface · 2018
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Edmund R HuntSchool of Biological Sciences , University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building , 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-9647-124X
Roland J BaddeleySchool of Experimental Psychology , University of Bristol , 12a Priory Road, Bristol BS8 1TU, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7431-6580
Alan WorleySchool of Biological Sciences , University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building , 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7734-7841
Ana B Sendova-FranksDepartment of Engineering Design and Mathematics , University of the West of England , Frenchay Campus, Coldharbour Lane, Bristol BS16 1QY, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9300-6986
Nigel R FranksSchool of Biological Sciences , University of Bristol, Life Sciences Building , 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TQ, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-8139-9604

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

To find useful work to do for their colony, individual eusocial animals have to move, somehow staying attentive to relevant social information. Recent research on individual Temnothorax albipennis ants moving inside their colony's nest found a power-law relationship between a movement's duration and its average speed; and a universal speed profile for movements showing that they mostly fluctuate around a constant average speed. From this predictability it was inferred that movement durations are somehow determined before the movement itself. Here, we find similar results in lone T. albipennis ants exploring a large arena outside the nest, both when the arena is clean and when it contains chemical information left by previous nest-mates. This implies that these movement characteristics originate from the same individual neural and/or physiological mechanism(s), operating without immediate regard to social influences. However, the presence of pheromones and/or other cues was found to affect the inter-event speed correlations. Hence we suggest that ants' motor planning results in intermittent response to the social environment: movement duration is adjusted in response to social information only between movements, not during them. This environmentally flexible, intermittently responsive movement behaviour points towards a spatially allocated division of labour in this species. It also prompts more general questions on collective animal movement and the role of intermittent causation from higher to lower organizational levels in the stability of complex systems.

Indexed as

complex social systemsdivision of labourintermittent top-down causalitymotor planningmovementself-similarity

Identifiers

PMID26909181
PMCPMC4736936

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.