Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26909143›Full record

ArticleEcology and evolution2016

Latitudinal variation in ecological opportunity and intraspecific competition indicates differences in niche variability and diet specialization of Arctic marine predators.

David J Yurkowski, Steve Ferguson, Emily S Choy, Lisa L Loseto, Tanya M Brown, Derek C G Muir, Christina A D Semeniuk, Aaron T Fisk

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Ecology and evolution, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 18 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
18citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

18 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Principles of niche expansion.Proceedings. Biological sciences · 2018
    Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

David J YurkowskiGreat Lakes Institute for Environmental Research University of Windsor Windsor ON N9B 3P4 Canada.
Steve FergusonFreshwater Institute Fisheries and Oceans Canada Winnipeg MB R3T 2N6 Canada.
Emily S ChoyDepartment of Biological Sciences University of Manitoba Winning MB R3T 2N6 Canada.
Lisa L LosetoFreshwater Institute Fisheries and Oceans Canada Winnipeg MB R3T 2N6 Canada.
Tanya M BrownDepartment of Geography Memorial University of Newfoundland St. John's NF A1B 3X9 Canada.
Derek C G MuirEnvironment Canada Aquatic Ecosystem Protection Research Division Burlington ON L7R 4A6 Canada.
Christina A D SemeniukGreat Lakes Institute for Environmental Research University of Windsor Windsor ON N9B 3P4 Canada.
Aaron T FiskGreat Lakes Institute for Environmental Research University of Windsor Windsor ON N9B 3P4 Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Individual specialization (IS), where individuals within populations irrespective of age, sex, and body size are either specialized or generalized in terms of resource use, has implications on ecological niches and food web structure. Niche size and degree of IS of near-top trophic-level marine predators have been little studied in polar regions or with latitude. We quantified the large-scale latitudinal variation of population- and individual-level niche size and IS in ringed seals (Pusa hispida) and beluga whales (Delphinapterus leucas) using stable carbon and nitrogen isotope analysis on 379 paired ringed seal liver and muscle samples and 124 paired beluga skin and muscle samples from eight locations ranging from the low to high Arctic. We characterized both within- and between-individual variation in predator niche size at each location as well as accounting for spatial differences in the isotopic ranges of potential prey. Total isotopic niche width (TINW) for populations of ringed seals and beluga decreased with increasing latitude. Higher TINW values were associated with greater ecological opportunity (i.e., prey diversity) in the prey fish community which mainly consists of Capelin (Mallotus villosus) and Sand lance (Ammodytes sp.) at lower latitudes and Arctic cod (Boreogadus saida) at high latitudes. In beluga, their dietary consistency between tissues also known as the within-individual component (WIC) increased in a near 1:1 ratio with TINW (slope = 0.84), suggesting dietary generalization, whereas the slope (0.18) of WIC relative to TINW in ringed seals indicated a high degree of individual specialization in ringed seal populations with higher TINWs. Our findings highlight the differences in TINW and level of IS for ringed seals and beluga relative to latitude as a likely response to large-scale spatial variation in ecological opportunity, suggesting species-specific variation in dietary plasticity to spatial differences in prey resources and environmental conditions in a rapidly changing ecosystem.

Indexed as

Beluga whalegeneralistmarine mammalsringed sealstable isotopestrophic ecology

Identifiers

PMID26909143
PMCPMC4752956

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.