Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26909116›Full record

ArticleTheranostics2016

(68)Ga-Pentixafor-PET/CT for Imaging of Chemokine Receptor 4 Expression in Glioblastoma.

Constantin Lapa, Katharina Lückerath, Irene Kleinlein, Camelia Maria Monoranu, Thomas Linsenmann, Almuth F Kessler, Martina Rudelius, Saskia Kropf, Andreas K Buck, Ralf-Ingo Ernestus and 3 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Theranostics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03335670 (Biodistribution of Ga-68 Pentixafor in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors), which is not on this map. Cited by 60 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
60citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.3field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03335670 early_phase1active not recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2017, after this paper: background citation

Biodistribution of Ga-68 Pentixafor in Patients With Neuroendocrine Tumors

TypeinterventionalSponsorYusuf MendaRan2017 to 2030Enrolled30ConditionsNeuroendocrine TumorsArms[68Ga]Pentixafor
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

60 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 115 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2020
    Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Development of an Optimized CXCR4-Targeting Theranostic Pair.Journal of nuclear medicine : official publication, Society of Nuclear Medicine · 2026
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Journal of neuro-oncology · 2025
    Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Advances in PET Imaging of the CXCR4 Receptor: [Seminars in nuclear medicine · 2024
    Review
  17. Nuclear Medicine and Cancer Theragnostics: Basic Concepts.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023
    Review
  18. Review
  19. A dataset of [Data in brief · 2023
    Article
  20. Automated synthesis and quality control of [EJNMMI radiopharmacy and chemistry · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Constantin Lapa1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany; 2. Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, Würzburg, Germany.
Katharina Lückerath1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany; 2. Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, Würzburg, Germany.
Irene Kleinlein2. Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, Würzburg, Germany; 3. Institute of Pathology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Camelia Maria Monoranu2. Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, Würzburg, Germany; 3. Institute of Pathology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Thomas Linsenmann2. Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, Würzburg, Germany; 4. Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Almuth F Kessler2. Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, Würzburg, Germany; 4. Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Martina Rudelius2. Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, Würzburg, Germany; 3. Institute of Pathology, University of Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Saskia Kropf5. Scintomics GmbH, Fürstenfeldbruck, Germany.
Andreas K Buck1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany; 2. Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, Würzburg, Germany.
Ralf-Ingo Ernestus2. Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, Würzburg, Germany; 4. Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Hans-Jürgen Wester6. Pharmaceutical Radiochemistry, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
Mario Löhr2. Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, Würzburg, Germany; 4. Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Ken Herrmann1. Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany; 2. Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken, Würzburg, Germany; 7. Department of Molecular and Medical Pharmacology, David Geffen School of Medicine at UCLA, Los Angeles, USA.
Comprehensive Cancer Center Mainfranken · DEUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEUniversity of Würzburg · DETechnical University of Munich · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Chemokine receptor-4 (CXCR4) has been reported to be overexpressed in glioblastoma (GBM) and to be associated with poor survival. This study investigated the feasibility of non-invasive CXCR4-directed imaging with positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) using the radiolabelled chemokine receptor ligand (68)Ga-Pentixafor. 15 patients with clinical suspicion on primary or recurrent glioblastoma (13 primary, 2 recurrent tumors) underwent (68)Ga-Pentixafor-PET/CT for assessment of CXCR4 expression prior to surgery. O-(2-(18)F-fluoroethyl)-L-tyrosine ((18)F-FET) PET/CT images were available in 11/15 cases and were compared visually and semi-quantitatively (SUVmax, SUVmean). Tumor-to-background ratios (TBR) were calculated for both PET probes. (68)Ga-Pentixafor-PET/CT results were also compared to histological CXCR4 expression on neuronavigated surgical samples. (68)Ga-Pentixafor-PET/CT was visually positive in 13/15 cases with SUVmean and SUVmax of 3.0±1.5 and 3.9±2.0 respectively. Respective values for (18)F-FET were 4.4±2.0 (SUVmean) and 5.3±2.3 (SUVmax). TBR for SUVmean and SUVmax were higher for (68)Ga-Pentixafor than for (18)F-FET (SUVmean 154.0±90.7 vs. 4.1±1.3; SUVmax 70.3±44.0 and 3.8±1.2, p<0.01), respectively. Histological analysis confirmed CXCR4 expression in tumor areas with high (68)Ga-Pentixafor uptake; regions of the same tumor without apparent (68)Ga-Pentixafor uptake showed no or low receptor expression. In this pilot study, (68)Ga-Pentixafor retention has been observed in the vast majority of glioblastoma lesions and served as readout for non-invasive determination of CXCR4 expression. Given the paramount importance of the CXCR4/SDF-1 axis in tumor biology, (68)Ga-Pentixafor-PET/CT might prove a useful tool for sensitive, non-invasive in-vivo quantification of CXCR4 as well as selection of patients who might benefit from CXCR4-directed therapy.

Indexed as

AdultAgedCoordination ComplexesGlioblastomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedPeptides, CyclicPilot ProjectsPositron-Emission TomographyReceptors, CXCR4Tomography68Ga-pentixaforCoordination ComplexesCXCR4 protein, humanPeptides, CyclicReceptors, CXCR4chemokine receptorCXCR4Glioblastomaneuro-oncologyPET.

Identifiers

PMID26909116
PMCPMC4737728
OpenAlexW2279623495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.