ArticleFrontiers in genetics2016
Estimating Effect Sizes and Expected Replication Probabilities from GWAS Summary Statistics.
Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 27 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
27 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- An efficient Bayesian meta-analysis approach for studying cross-phenotype genetic associations.PLoS genetics · 2018Pooled it
- Identifying causal genetic variants for high-altitude adaptation through blood eQTL analysis in plateau populations.Communications biology · 2026Article
- High cell-type specificity of eQTLs revealed by single-nucleus analyses of brain and blood.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2025Article
- Alternative to the statistical mass confusion of testing for "no effect".The Journal of cell biology · 2025Article
- An Ocular Gene-Set Expression Library for Heritability Partition and Cell Line Enrichment Analyses.Investigative ophthalmology & visual science · 2025Article
- How Real-World Data Can Facilitate the Development of Precision Medicine Treatment in Psychiatry.Biological psychiatry · 2024Review
- PICALO: principal interaction component analysis for the identification of discrete technical, cell-type, and environmental factors that mediate eQTLs.Genome biology · 2024Article
- Brain expression quantitative trait locus and network analyses reveal downstream effects and putative drivers for brain-related diseases.Nature genetics · 2023Article
- Polygenic risk scores for schizophrenia and major depression are associated with socio-economic indicators of adversity in two British community samples.Translational psychiatry · 2022Article
- Integrating variant functional annotation scores have varied abilities to improve power of genome-wide association studies.Scientific reports · 2022Article
- Analysis of the Associations Between the Human Fecal Microbiome and Bone Density, Structure, and Strength: The Osteoporotic Fractures in Men (MrOS) Cohort.Journal of bone and mineral research : the official journal of the American Society for Bone and Mineral Research · 2022Article
- Impact of new-onset versus pre-existing atrial fibrillation on outcomes after transcatheter aortic valve replacement/implantation.International journal of cardiology. Heart & vasculature · 2022Review
- Evaluating brain structure traits as endophenotypes using polygenicity and discoverability.Human brain mapping · 2022Article
- Preanalytical Sample Handling Conditions and Their Effects on the Human Serum Metabolome in Epidemiologic Studies.American journal of epidemiology · 2021Article
- Estimation of non-null SNP effect size distributions enables the detection of enriched genes underlying complex traits.PLoS genetics · 2020Article
- Beyond SNP heritability: Polygenicity and discoverability of phenotypes estimated with a univariate Gaussian mixture model.PLoS genetics · 2020Article
- The emerging pattern of shared polygenic architecture of psychiatric disorders, conceptual and methodological challenges.Psychiatric genetics · 2019Review
- Mapping causal pathways from genetics to neuropsychiatric disorders using genome-wide imaging genetics: Current status and future directions.Psychiatry and clinical neurosciences · 2019Review
- Bivariate causal mixture model quantifies polygenic overlap between complex traits beyond genetic correlation.Nature communications · 2019Article
- Psychiatric genetics and the structure of psychopathology.Molecular psychiatry · 2019Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Genome-wide Association Studies (GWAS) result in millions of summary statistics ("z-scores") for single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) associations with phenotypes. These rich datasets afford deep insights into the nature and extent of genetic contributions to complex phenotypes such as psychiatric disorders, which are understood to have substantial genetic components that arise from very large numbers of SNPs. The complexity of the datasets, however, poses a significant challenge to maximizing their utility. This is reflected in a need for better understanding the landscape of z-scores, as such knowledge would enhance causal SNP and gene discovery, help elucidate mechanistic pathways, and inform future study design. Here we present a parsimonious methodology for modeling effect sizes and replication probabilities, relying only on summary statistics from GWAS substudies, and a scheme allowing for direct empirical validation. We show that modeling z-scores as a mixture of Gaussians is conceptually appropriate, in particular taking into account ubiquitous non-null effects that are likely in the datasets due to weak linkage disequilibrium with causal SNPs. The four-parameter model allows for estimating the degree of polygenicity of the phenotype and predicting the proportion of chip heritability explainable by genome-wide significant SNPs in future studies with larger sample sizes. We apply the model to recent GWAS of schizophrenia (N = 82,315) and putamen volume (N = 12,596), with approximately 9.3 million SNP z-scores in both cases. We show that, over a broad range of z-scores and sample sizes, the model accurately predicts expectation estimates of true effect sizes and replication probabilities in multistage GWAS designs. We assess the degree to which effect sizes are over-estimated when based on linear-regression association coefficients. We estimate the polygenicity of schizophrenia to be 0.037 and the putamen to be 0.001, while the respective sample sizes required to approach fully explaining the chip heritability are 10(6) and 10(5). The model can be extended to incorporate prior knowledge such as pleiotropy and SNP annotation. The current findings suggest that the model is applicable to a broad array of complex phenotypes and will enhance understanding of their genetic architectures.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.