Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26909044›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in physiology2016

Fluoxetine Protection in Decompression Sickness in Mice is Enhanced by Blocking TREK-1 Potassium Channel with the "spadin" Antidepressant.

Nicolas Vallée, Kate Lambrechts, Sébastien De Maistre, Perrine Royal, Jean Mazella, Marc Borsotto, Catherine Heurteaux, Jacques Abraini, Jean-Jacques Risso, Jean-Eric Blatteau

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in physiology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. COInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Potential of Heterogeneous Compounds as Antidepressants: A Narrative Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Nicolas ValléeInstitut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées, Equipe Résidante de Recherche Subaquatique Opérationnelle Toulon, France.
Kate LambrechtsInstitut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées, Equipe Résidante de Recherche Subaquatique OpérationnelleToulon, France; UFR STAPS, Laboratoire Motricité Humaine Education Sport Santé, Université du Sud Toulon VarLa Garde, France.
Sébastien De MaistreHôpital d'Instruction des Armées, Service de Médecine Hyperbare et Expertise Plongée Toulon, France.
Perrine RoyalInstitut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées, Equipe Résidante de Recherche Subaquatique Opérationnelle Toulon, France.
Jean MazellaCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique and Université de Nice Sophia Antipolis, Institut de Pharmacologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, UMR 7275 Valbonne, France.
Marc BorsottoCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique and Université de Nice Sophia Antipolis, Institut de Pharmacologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, UMR 7275 Valbonne, France.
Catherine HeurteauxCentre National de la Recherche Scientifique and Université de Nice Sophia Antipolis, Institut de Pharmacologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire, UMR 7275 Valbonne, France.
Jacques AbrainiInstitut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées, Equipe Résidante de Recherche Subaquatique OpérationnelleToulon, France; Département d'Anesthésiologie, Université LavalQuébec, QC, Canada; Faculté de Médecine, Université de Caen NormandieCaen, France.
Jean-Jacques RissoInstitut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées, Equipe Résidante de Recherche Subaquatique Opérationnelle Toulon, France.
Jean-Eric BlatteauInstitut de Recherche Biomédicale des Armées, Equipe Résidante de Recherche Subaquatique Opérationnelle Toulon, France.
Hôpital d'Instruction des Armées Sainte-Anne · FRInstitut de Pharmacologie Moléculaire et Cellulaire · FRLaboratoire Motricité Humaine Éducation Sport Santé · FRUniversité de Caen Normandie · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In mice, disseminated coagulation, inflammation, and ischemia induce neurological damage that can lead to death. These symptoms result from circulating bubbles generated by a pathogenic decompression. Acute fluoxetine treatment or the presence of the TREK-1 potassium channel increases the survival rate when mice are subjected to an experimental dive/decompression protocol. This is a paradox because fluoxetine is a blocker of TREK-1 channels. First, we studied the effects of an acute dose of fluoxetine (50 mg/kg) in wild-type (WT) and TREK-1 deficient mice (knockout homozygous KO and heterozygous HET). Then, we combined the same fluoxetine treatment with a 5-day treatment protocol with spadin, in order to specifically block TREK-1 activity (KO-like mice). KO and KO-like mice were regarded as antidepressed models. In total, 167 mice (45 WTcont 46 WTflux 30 HETflux and 46 KOflux) constituting the flux-pool and 113 supplementary mice (27 KO-like 24 WTflux2 24 KO-likeflux 21 WTcont2 17 WTno dive) constituting the spad-pool were included in this study. Only 7% of KO-TREK-1 treated with fluoxetine (KOflux) and 4% of mice treated with both spadin and fluoxetine (KO-likeflux) died from decompression sickness (DCS) symptoms. These values are much lower than those of WT control (62%) or KO-like mice (41%). After the decompression protocol, mice showed significant consumption of their circulating platelets and leukocytes. Spadin antidepressed mice were more likely to exhibit DCS. Nevertheless, mice which had both blocked TREK-1 channels and fluoxetine treatment were better protected against DCS. We conclude that the protective effect of such an acute dose of fluoxetine is enhanced when TREK-1 is inhibited. We confirmed that antidepressed models may have worse DCS outcomes, but concomitant fluoxetine treatment not only decreased DCS severity but increased the survival rate.

Indexed as

bubblecapillary leakdecompression sicknessdepressiondiapedesisdivingkcnk2TREK-1

Identifiers

PMID26909044
PMCPMC4755105
OpenAlexW2289252879

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.