ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2016
Structural Brain Network: What is the Effect of LiFE Optimization of Whole Brain Tractography?
Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Changes in the structural brain connectome over the course of a nonrandomized clinical trial for acute mania.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022Trial
- Changes in the brain structural connectome after a prospective randomized clinical trial of lithium and quetiapine treatment in youth with bipolar disorder.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021Trial
- Innovative Neuroimaging Biomarker Distinction of Major Depressive Disorder and Bipolar Disorder through Structural Connectome Analysis and Machine Learning Models.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Diffusion capacity of single and interconnected networks.Nature communications · 2023Article
- Disconnectome associated with progressive white matter hyperintensities in aging: a virtual lesion study.Frontiers in aging neuroscience · 2023Article
- Disruption of gray matter morphological networks in patients with paroxysmal kinesigenic dyskinesia.Human brain mapping · 2021Article
- Integrating Structural and Functional Interhemispheric Brain Connectivity of Gait Freezing in Parkinson's Disease.Frontiers in neurology · 2021Article
- The open diffusion data derivatives, brain data upcycling via integrated publishing of derivatives and reproducible open cloud services.Scientific data · 2019Article
- Cooperative contributions of structural and functional connectivity to successful memory in aging.Network neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2019Article
- Fiber visualization for preoperative glioma assessment: Tractography versus local connectivity mapping.PloS one · 2019Article
- Confirmation of a gyral bias in diffusion MRI fiber tractography.Human brain mapping · 2018Article
- Disrupted topological organization of structural networks revealed by probabilistic diffusion tractography in Tourette syndrome children.Human brain mapping · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Structural brain networks constructed based on diffusion-weighted MRI (dMRI) have provided a systems perspective to explore the organization of the human brain. Some redundant and nonexistent fibers, however, are inevitably generated in whole brain tractography. We propose to add one critical step while constructing the networks to remove these fibers using the linear fascicle evaluation (LiFE) method, and study the differences between the networks with and without LiFE optimization. For a cohort of nine healthy adults and for 9 out of the 35 subjects from Human Connectome Project, the T 1-weighted images and dMRI data are analyzed. Each brain is parcellated into 90 regions-of-interest, whilst a probabilistic tractography algorithm is applied to generate the original connectome. The elimination of redundant and nonexistent fibers from the original connectome by LiFE creates the optimized connectome, and the random selection of the same number of fibers as the optimized connectome creates the non-optimized connectome. The combination of parcellations and these connectomes leads to the optimized and non-optimized networks, respectively. The optimized networks are constructed with six weighting schemes, and the correlations of different weighting methods are analyzed. The fiber length distributions of the non-optimized and optimized connectomes are compared. The optimized and non-optimized networks are compared with regard to edges, nodes and networks, within a sparsity range of 0.75-0.95. It has been found that relatively more short fibers exist in the optimized connectome. About 24.0% edges of the optimized network are significantly different from those in the non-optimized network at a sparsity of 0.75. About 13.2% of edges are classified as false positives or the possible missing edges. The strength and betweenness centrality of some nodes are significantly different for the non-optimized and optimized networks, but not the node efficiency. The normalized clustering coefficient, the normalized characteristic path length and the small-worldness are higher in the optimized network weighted by the fiber number than in the non-optimized network. These observed differences suggest that LiFE optimization can be a crucial step for the construction of more reasonable and more accurate structural brain networks.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.