Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26909034›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in computational neuroscience2016

Structural Brain Network: What is the Effect of LiFE Optimization of Whole Brain Tractography?

Shouliang Qi, Stephan Meesters, Klaas Nicolay, Bart M Ter Haar Romeny, Pauly Ossenblok

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in computational neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Changes in the structural brain connectome over the course of a nonrandomized clinical trial for acute mania.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2022
    Trial
  2. Changes in the brain structural connectome after a prospective randomized clinical trial of lithium and quetiapine treatment in youth with bipolar disorder.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2021
    Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shouliang QiSino-Dutch Biomedical and Information Engineering School, Northeastern UniversityShenyang, China; Academic Center for Epileptology Kempenhaeghe and Maastricht UMC+Heeze, Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of TechnologyEindhoven, Netherlands.
Stephan MeestersAcademic Center for Epileptology Kempenhaeghe and Maastricht UMC+Heeze, Netherlands; Department of Mathematics and Computer Science, Eindhoven University of TechnologyEindhoven, Netherlands.
Klaas NicolayDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology Eindhoven, Netherlands.
Bart M Ter Haar RomenySino-Dutch Biomedical and Information Engineering School, Northeastern UniversityShenyang, China; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of TechnologyEindhoven, Netherlands.
Pauly OssenblokAcademic Center for Epileptology Kempenhaeghe and Maastricht UMC+Heeze, Netherlands; Department of Biomedical Engineering, Eindhoven University of TechnologyEindhoven, Netherlands.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Structural brain networks constructed based on diffusion-weighted MRI (dMRI) have provided a systems perspective to explore the organization of the human brain. Some redundant and nonexistent fibers, however, are inevitably generated in whole brain tractography. We propose to add one critical step while constructing the networks to remove these fibers using the linear fascicle evaluation (LiFE) method, and study the differences between the networks with and without LiFE optimization. For a cohort of nine healthy adults and for 9 out of the 35 subjects from Human Connectome Project, the T 1-weighted images and dMRI data are analyzed. Each brain is parcellated into 90 regions-of-interest, whilst a probabilistic tractography algorithm is applied to generate the original connectome. The elimination of redundant and nonexistent fibers from the original connectome by LiFE creates the optimized connectome, and the random selection of the same number of fibers as the optimized connectome creates the non-optimized connectome. The combination of parcellations and these connectomes leads to the optimized and non-optimized networks, respectively. The optimized networks are constructed with six weighting schemes, and the correlations of different weighting methods are analyzed. The fiber length distributions of the non-optimized and optimized connectomes are compared. The optimized and non-optimized networks are compared with regard to edges, nodes and networks, within a sparsity range of 0.75-0.95. It has been found that relatively more short fibers exist in the optimized connectome. About 24.0% edges of the optimized network are significantly different from those in the non-optimized network at a sparsity of 0.75. About 13.2% of edges are classified as false positives or the possible missing edges. The strength and betweenness centrality of some nodes are significantly different for the non-optimized and optimized networks, but not the node efficiency. The normalized clustering coefficient, the normalized characteristic path length and the small-worldness are higher in the optimized network weighted by the fiber number than in the non-optimized network. These observed differences suggest that LiFE optimization can be a crucial step for the construction of more reasonable and more accurate structural brain networks.

Indexed as

brain networkconnectomediffusion-weighted MRIstructural connectivitytractography

Identifiers

PMID26909034
PMCPMC4754446

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.