Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26909022›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in cellular neuroscience2016

Proteomics Research in Schizophrenia.

Katarina Davalieva, Ivana Maleva Kostovska, Andrew J Dwork

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in cellular neuroscience, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 48 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
48citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
7.7field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

48 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 86 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Review
  16. Review
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Katarina DavalievaResearch Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology "Georgi D Efremov," Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts Skopje, Republic of Macedonia.
Ivana Maleva KostovskaResearch Centre for Genetic Engineering and Biotechnology "Georgi D Efremov," Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts Skopje, Republic of Macedonia.
Andrew J DworkDepartment of Molecular Imaging and Neuropathology, New York State Psychiatric InstituteNew York, NY, USA; Departments of Psychiatry and Pathology and Cell Biology, College of Physicians and Surgeons of Columbia UniversityNew York, NY, USA; Macedonian Academy of Sciences and ArtsSkopje, Republic of Macedonia.
Macedonian Academy of Sciences and Arts · MKColumbia University · US

Funding

Golgi Studies of SchizophreniaR01MH064168 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI DWORK, ANDREW J · 2001 to 2013
$4.3M
Myelin Pathology in SchizophreniaR01MH060877 · NIMH · NEW YORK STATE PSYCHIATRIC INSTITUTE DBA RESEARCH FOUNDATION FOR MENTAL HYGIENE, INC · PI DWORK, ANDREW J · 1999 to 2011
$2.4M
Building Schizophrenia Research in MacedoniaR01MH098786 · NIMH · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI DWORK, ANDREW J, ROSOKLIJA, GORAZD B. · 2012 to 2016
$2.2M
NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH060877NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH064168NIMH NIH HHS R01 MH098786
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Despite intense scientific efforts, the neuropathology and pathophysiology of schizophrenia are poorly understood. Proteomic studies, by testing large numbers of proteins for associations with disease, may contribute to the understanding of the molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia. They may also indicate the types and locations of cells most likely to harbor pathological alterations. Investigations using proteomic approaches have already provided much information on quantitative and qualitative protein patterns in postmortem brain tissue, peripheral tissues and body fluids. Different proteomic technologies such as 2-D PAGE, 2-D DIGE, SELDI-TOF, shotgun proteomics with label-based (ICAT), and label-free (MS(E)) quantification have been applied to the study of schizophrenia for the past 15 years. This review summarizes the results, mostly from brain but also from other tissues and bodily fluids, of proteomics studies in schizophrenia. Emphasis is given to proteomics platforms, varying sources of material, proposed candidate biomarkers emerging from comparative proteomics studies, and the specificity of the putative markers in terms of other mental illnesses. We also compare proteins altered in schizophrenia with reports of protein or mRNA sequences that are relatively enriched in specific cell types. While proteomic studies of schizophrenia find abnormalities in the expression of many proteins that are not cell type-specific, there appears to be a disproportionate representation of proteins whose synthesis and localization are highly enriched in one or more brain cell type compared with other types of brain cells. Two of the three proteins most commonly altered in schizophrenia are aldolase C and glial fibrillary acidic protein, astrocytic proteins with entirely different functions, but the studies are approximately evenly divided with regard to the direction of the differences and the concordance or discordance between the two proteins. Alterations of common myelin-associated proteins were also frequently observed, and in four studies that identified alterations in at least two, all differences were downwards in schizophrenia, consistent with earlier studies examining RNA or targeting myelin-associated proteins.

Indexed as

2D-DIGEastrocytesbrain tissuegliamyelinoligodendrocytesshotgun proteomics

Identifiers

PMID26909022
PMCPMC4754401
OpenAlexW2277292811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.