Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26909012›Full record

Trial reportGerman medical science : GMS e-journal2016

Recurrent urinary tract infections and complications after symptomatic versus antibiotic treatment: follow-up of a randomised controlled trial.

Jutta Bleidorn, Eva Hummers-Pradier, Guido Schmiemann, Birgitt Wiese, Ildikó Gágyor

Open access · greenAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in German medical science : GMS e-journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 48 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Trial
  5. Trial
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Management of Acute Cystitis in the Era of COVID-19.Current bladder dysfunction reports · 2023
    Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Treatment of Urinary Tract Infections with CanephronAntibiotics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2021
    Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jutta BleidornInstitute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Eva Hummers-PradierDepartment of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Medical Center, Goettingen, Germany.
Guido SchmiemannInstitute for Public Health and Nursing Research, Department for Health Services Research, University of Bremen, Germany.
Birgitt WieseInstitute for General Practice, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Ildikó GágyorDepartment of General Practice and Family Medicine, University Medical Center, Goettingen, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEUniversity of Göttingen · DEDepartment of Health Services · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUncomplicated urinary tract infections (UTI) are common in general practice, and are usually treated with antibiotics. Recurrent UTI often pose a serious problem for affected women. Little is known about recurrent UTI and complications when uncomplicated UTI are treated without antibiotics. With ICUTI (Immediate vs. conditional antibiotic use in uncomplicated UTI, funded by BMBF No. 01KG1105) we assessed whether initial symptomatic treatment with ibuprofen could be a treatment alternative for uncomplicated UTI. The presented analysis aims to assess the influence of initial (non-)antibiotic treatment on recurrent UTI rates and pyelonephritis after day 28 up to 6 months after trial participation.

methodsThis study is a retrospective long-term follow-up analysis of ICUTI patients, surveyed telephonically six months after inclusion in the trial. Recurrent UTI, pyelonephritis or hospitalizations were documented. Statistical evaluation was performed by descriptive and multivariate analyses with SPSS 21.

resultsFor the six months follow-up survey, 386 trial participants could be contacted (494 had been included in ICUTI initially, 446 had completed the trial). From day 28 until 6 months after inclusion in ICUTI, 84 recurrent UTI were reported by 80 patients. Univariate and multivariate analyses showed no effect of initial treatment group or antibiotic treatment on number of patients with recurrent UTI. Yet, both analyses showed that patients with a history of previous UTI had significantly more often recurrent UTI. Pyelonephritis occurred in two patients of the antibiotic group and in one patient in the non-antibiotic group.

conclusionThis follow-up analysis of a trial comparing antibiotic vs. symptomatic treatment for uncomplicated UTI showed that non-antibiotic treatment has no negative impact on recurrent UTI rates or pyelonephritis after day 28 and up to six months after initial treatment. Thus, a four week follow-up in UTI trials seems adequate.

Indexed as

AdolescentAdultAgedAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalBacterial InfectionsCombined Modality TherapyFemaleGermanyHospitalizationHumansIbuprofenMaleMiddle AgedPrevalencePyelonephritisAnti-Bacterial AgentsAnti-Inflammatory Agents, Non-SteroidalIbuprofenfollow-uppyelonephritisrecurrent UTIurinary tract infections

Identifiers

PMID26909012
PMCPMC4749724
OpenAlexW2415000560

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.