ArticlePediatrics2016
Risk of Cancer in Children Conceived by Assisted Reproductive Technology.
Article in Pediatrics, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 24 papers, 4 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
24 citing papers in PubMed, 4 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Assisted Reproductive Technology and Risk of Childhood Cancer Among the Offspring of Parents With Infertility: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JMIR cancer · 2025Pooled it
- Cumulative temporal association between assisted reproductive technology and childhood cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies.Frontiers in oncology · 2025Pooled it
- Maternal Medication Use and Childhood Cancer in Offspring-Systematic Review and Considerations for Researchers.American journal of epidemiology · 2021Pooled it
- Cancer risk among children conceived by fertility treatment.International journal of cancer · 2019Pooled it
- Sex differences in childhood cancer risk following ART conception: a registry-based study.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2025Article
- Children born to subfertile couples, how are they doing? Evidence from research.Archives of disease in childhood · 2024Review
- Medically Assisted Reproduction and Risk of Cancer Among Offspring.JAMA network open · 2024Article
- Cancer in children born after frozen-thawed embryo transfer: A cohort study.PLoS medicine · 2022Article
- Etiology of Acute Leukemia: A Review.Cancers · 2021Review
- Adnexal torsion in pregnancy after in vitro fertilization: Case report and literature review.Medicine · 2021Review
- A bespoke data linkage of an IVF clinical quality registry to population health datasets; methods and performance.International journal of population data science · 2021Article
- Early Life Oxidative Stress and Long-Lasting Cardiovascular Effects on Offspring Conceived by Assisted Reproductive Technologies: A Review.International journal of molecular sciences · 2020Review
- Preconception nutraceutical food supplementation can prevent oxidative and epigenetic DNA alterations induced by ovarian stimulation for IVF and increases pregnancy rates.Facts, views & vision in ObGyn · 2020Article
- Children Conceived by Assisted Reproductive Technology Prone to Low Birth Weight, Preterm Birth, and Birth Defects: A Cohort Review of More Than 50,000 Live Births During 2011-2017 in Taiwan.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2020Article
- Risk of cancer in children and young adults conceived by assisted reproductive technology.Human reproduction (Oxford, England) · 2019Article
- Correction to: Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and childhood cancer: is the risk real?Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2018Article
- Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) and childhood cancer: is the risk real?Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2018Article
- Intracytoplasmic sperm injection for male infertility and consequences for offspring.Nature reviews. Urology · 2018Review
- Transitioning from Infertility-Based (ART 1.0) to Elective (ART 2.0) Use of Assisted Reproductive Technologies and the DOHaD Hypothesis: Do We Need to Change Consenting?Seminars in reproductive medicine · 2018Review
- Parental age and childhood cancer risk: A Danish population-based registry study.Cancer epidemiology · 2017Article
Corrections and comments
- Commented on by
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectiveAn increasing number of children are born after assisted reproductive technology (ART), and monitoring their long-term health effects is of interest. This study compares cancer risk in children conceived by ART to that in children conceived without.
methodsThe Medical Birth Registry of Norway contains individual information on all children born in Norway (including information of ART conceptions). All children born between 1984 and 2011 constituted the study cohort, and cancer data were obtained from the Cancer Registry of Norway. Follow-up started at date of birth and ended on the date of the first cancer diagnosis, death, emigration, or December 31, 2011. A Cox proportional hazards model was used to calculate hazard ratios (HR) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of overall cancer risk between children conceived by ART and those not. Cancer risk was also assessed separately for all childhood cancer types.
resultsThe study cohort comprised 1 628 658 children, of which 25 782 were conceived by ART. Of the total 4554 cancers, 51 occurred in ART-conceived children. Risk of overall cancer was not significantly elevated (HR 1.21; 95% CI 0.90-1.63). However, increased risk of leukemia was observed for children conceived by ART compared with those who were not (HR 1.67; 95% CI 1.02-2.73). Elevated risk of Hodgkin's lymphoma was also found for ART-conceived children (HR 3.63; 95% CI 1.12-11.72), although this was based on small numbers.
conclusionsThis population-based cohort study found elevated risks of leukemia and Hodgkin's lymphoma in children conceived by ART.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.