Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26908568›Full record

ArticleJournal of diabetes science and technology2016

The Effects of Temperature and Relative Humidity on Point-of-Care Glucose Measurements in Hospital Practice in a Tropical Clinical Setting.

Busadee Pratumvinit, Nattakom Charoenkoop, Soamsiri Niwattisaiwong, Gerald J Kost, Panutsaya Tientadakul

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of diabetes science and technology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Validation of Point-of-care Testing Device HemoCue® Glucose 201RT in Blood Glucose Estimation.Indian journal of community medicine : official publication of Indian Association of Preventive & Social Medicine · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Busadee PratumvinitDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand busadee.pra@mahidol.ac.th.
Nattakom CharoenkoopDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Soamsiri NiwattisaiwongDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.
Gerald J KostPoint-of-Care Testing Center for Teaching and Research, School of Medicine, University of California and Knowledge Optimization®, Davis, CA, USA.
Panutsaya TientadakulDepartment of Clinical Pathology, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHospitals in tropical countries experience conditions that exceed manufacturer temperature and humidity limits for point-of-care (POC) glucose reagents. Our goal was to assess the effects of out-of-limits storage temperature, operating temperature, and operating humidity on POC glucose measurement reliability.

methodsQuality control measurements were performed monthly using glucose test strips stored under controlled conditions and in inpatient wards under ambient conditions. Glucose test strips were evaluated in groups organized by operating temperatures of 24-25 (group 1), 28-29 (group 2), and 33-34°C (group 3), and relative humidity (RH) of ≤70 (group A), ~80 (group B), and ~90% (group C).

resultsGlucose results for different storage conditions were inconsistent. Measurements at higher operating temperatures had lower values with mean differences of -2.4 (P < .001) and -36.5 (P < .001) mg/dL (28-29 vs 24-25°C), and -3.6 (P < .001) and -37.4 (P < .001) mg/dL (33-34 vs 24-25°C) for low and high control levels, respectively. Measurements at higher RH had lower values with mean differences of -4.0 (P < .001) and -13.2 (P < .001) mg/dL (~80 vs ≤70% RH), and -5.8 (P < .001) and -16.6 (P < .001) mg/dL (~90 vs ≤70% RH) for low and high levels, respectively.

conclusionsHigh temperature and high RH decreased glucose concentrations for the POC oxidase-based system we evaluated. We recommend that individual hospitals perform stress testing, then determine if maximum absolute differences, which represent highest risk for patients, are clinically significant for decision making by using error grid analysis.

Indexed as

Hot TemperaturePoint-of-Care TestingReagent StripsBlood GlucoseHospitalsHumansHumidityBlood GlucoseReagent Stripsenvironmental stressglucoseglucose meterhumiditypoint of caretemperature

Identifiers

PMID26908568
PMCPMC5032940

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.