Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26908537›Full record

ArticleClinical trials (London, England)2016

Recruitment strategies at the Iowa site for parent/infant pairs in a longitudinal dental caries study.

Jeanette M Daly, Barcey T Levy, Yinghui Xu, Steven M Levy, Margherita Fontana

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Clinical trials (London, England), 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Provider and Parent Perspectives on Pediatric Screening for Research on Early Life Adversity.Health education & behavior : the official publication of the Society for Public Health Education · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jeanette M DalyDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA jeanette-daly@uiowa.edu.
Barcey T LevyDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA Department of Epidemiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Yinghui XuDepartment of Family Medicine, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Steven M LevyCollege of Dentistry, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
Margherita FontanaSchool of Dentistry, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.

Funding

Predicting Caries Risk in Underserved Toddlers in Primary Healthcare SettingsU01DE021412 · NIDCR · UNIVERSITY OF MICHIGAN AT ANN ARBOR · PI Margherita R Fontana · 2011 to 2026
$24.0M
NIDCR NIH HHS U01 DE021412
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

BACKGROUND/

aimsRecruitment of parent/infant pairs can be more difficult and challenging than recruitment of adult subjects alone as the parent has to consider themselves along with the infant to be study participants. In order to determine which recruitment methods most effectively resulted in accrual of subjects, recruitment efforts at the University of Iowa were evaluated, one of three clinical sites involved in a longitudinal prospective study of dental caries.

methodsEnrollment goals were 300 parent/infant pairs within a year. Recruitment strategies included (1) a direct mailing to potential subjects who were University of Iowa Hospitals and Clinics patients and potentially met inclusion criteria; (2) face-to-face recruitment visits at medical offices; (3) provision of recruitment materials to staff at off-campus agencies and medical offices serving low-income individuals; (4) a campus-wide mass e-mail; (5) recruitment materials to daycare centers and neighborhood centers; and (6) recruitment at a children's museum.

resultsFrom these recruitment efforts, 515 potential participants expressed interest and were screened for this study and 348 (68%) were enrolled during an 11-month time period. The face-to-face strategy had the highest recruitment rate of 25%, followed by direct individual mailings at 9% and follow-up telephone calls at 7%. For the face-to-face strategy, the contact at the children's museum was most successful compared to the other office settings. The lowest rate of recruitment of 0.09% was attained with the mass e-mail. However, in terms of actual numbers recruited, the mass e-mail remained an important modality since it yielded 21 recruits and was much less time-intensive.

conclusionAn intensive, multi-pronged recruitment strategy proved successful in meeting enrollment goals and resulted in finishing the enrollment prior to the projected study deadline. Effective recruitment approaches are imperative for a study's success and each recruitment strategy needs to be budgeted and planned for in a study. Investigators may need to adapt their approach to attain the needed number of subjects. Planning needs to include the numbers needed to be approached to attain your recruitment goal, how you will recruit, who will be responsible, and the costs and time commitment for various strategies.

Indexed as

Dental CariesParentsPatient SelectionHumansInfantIowaLongitudinal StudiesProspective Studiesdental cariesfamily physicianspractice-based research networkStudy recruitment

Identifiers

PMID26908537
PMCPMC4965278

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.