Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26908402›Full record

ArticleJournal of the American Heart Association2016

Practice-Level Variation in Outpatient Cardiac Care and Association With Outcomes.

Jeffrey D Clough, Rahul Rajkumar, Matthew T Crim, Lesli S Ott, Nihar R Desai, Patrick H Conway, Sha Maresh, Daver C Kahvecioglu, Harlan M Krumholz

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of the American Heart Association, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Jeffrey D CloughCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD Duke Clinical Research Institute, Department of Medicine, Duke University, Durham, NC Jeffrey.clough@duke.edu.
Rahul RajkumarCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD.
Matthew T CrimDepartment of Medicine, Emory University, Atlanta, GA.
Lesli S OttCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT.
Nihar R DesaiCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT.
Patrick H ConwayCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD.
Sha MareshCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD.
Daver C KahveciogluCenters for Medicare and Medicaid Services, Baltimore, MD.
Harlan M KrumholzCenter for Outcomes Research and Evaluation, Yale-New Haven Hospital, New Haven, CT Section of Cardiovascular Medicine and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation Clinical Scholars Program, Department of Internal Medicine, Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT Department of Health Policy and Management, Yale School of Public Health, New Haven, CT.

Funding

Center for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research at Yale UniversityU01HL105270 · NHLBI · YALE UNIVERSITY · PI CURTIS, JEPTHA PELHAM, KRUMHOLZ, HARLAN MARC · 2010 to 2013
$5.8M
NHLBI NIH HHS U01 HL105270-05
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundUtilization of cardiac services varies across regions and hospitals, yet little is known regarding variation in the intensity of outpatient cardiac care across cardiology physician practices or the association with clinical endpoints, an area of potential importance to promote efficient care. METHODS AND

resultsWe included 7 160 732 Medicare beneficiaries who received services from 5635 cardiology practices in 2012. Beneficiaries were assigned to practices providing the plurality of office visits, and practices were ranked and assigned to quartiles using the ratio of observed to predicted annual payments per beneficiary for common cardiac services (outpatient intensity index). The median (interquartile range) outpatient intensity index was 1.00 (0.81-1.24). Mean payments for beneficiaries attributed to practices in the highest (Q4) and lowest (Q1) quartile of outpatient intensity were: all cardiac payments (Q4 $1272 vs Q1 $581; ratio, 2.2); cardiac catheterization (Q4 $215 vs Q1 $64; ratio, 3.4); myocardial perfusion imaging (Q4 $253 vs Q1 $83; ratio, 3.0); and electrophysiology device procedures (Q4 $353 vs Q1 $142; ratio, 2.5). The adjusted odds ratios (95% CI) for 1 incremental quartile of outpatient intensity for each outcome was: cardiac surgical/procedural hospitalization (1.09 [1.09, 1.10]); cardiac medical hospitalization (1.00 [0.99, 1.00]); noncardiac hospitalization (0.99 [0.99, 0.99]); and death at 1 year (1.00 [0.99, 1.00]).

conclusionSubstantial variation in the intensity of outpatient care exists at the cardiology practice level, and higher intensity is not associated with reduced mortality or hospitalizations. Outpatient cardiac care is a potentially important target for efforts to improve efficiency in the Medicare population.

Indexed as

AgedAged, 80 and overAmbulatory CareCardiologyFemaleHealth Care CostsHealthcare DisparitiesHeart DiseasesHospitalizationHumansMaleMedicareMiddle AgedOffice VisitsPractice Patterns, Physicians'Process Assessment, Health Caremortalityphysician practice variationpopulation

Identifiers

PMID26908402
PMCPMC4802452

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.