Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26908258›Full record

ArticleQuality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation2016

The internal and external responsiveness of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) and Short Form-12 Health Survey version 2 (SF-12 v2) in patients with prostate cancer.

Edmond P H Choi, Carlos K H Wong, Eric Y F Wan, James H L Tsu, W Y Chin, Kenny Kung, M K Yiu

Erratum issuedAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Health-related quality of life in ethnically diverse Black prostate cancer survivors: a convergent parallel mixed-methods approach.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Evaluation of the responsiveness of Short Form-12 Health Survey version 2 (SF-12v2) in Chinese patients with hypertension in primary care.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2019
    Article
  13. Evaluation of the internal and external responsiveness of Short Form-12 Health Survey version 2 (SF-12v2) in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus.Quality of life research : an international journal of quality of life aspects of treatment, care and rehabilitation · 2018
    Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Edmond P H ChoiSchool of Nursing, University of Hong Kong, 4/F, William M.W. Mong Block, 21 Sassoon Road, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong. h0714919@hku.hk.
Carlos K H WongDepartment of Family Medicine and Primary Care, University of Hong Kong, Ap Lei Chau, Hong Kong.
Eric Y F WanDepartment of Family Medicine and Primary Care, University of Hong Kong, Ap Lei Chau, Hong Kong.
James H L TsuDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong.
W Y ChinDepartment of Family Medicine and Primary Care, University of Hong Kong, Ap Lei Chau, Hong Kong.
Kenny KungDepartment of Family Medicine and Primary Care, University of Hong Kong, Ap Lei Chau, Hong Kong.
M K YiuDivision of Urology, Department of Surgery, University of Hong Kong, Pok Fu Lam, Hong Kong.
University of Hong Kong · HK

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

purposeTo examine the responsiveness of Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) and Short Form-12 Health Survey version 2 (SF-12 v2) in prostate cancer patients because there is a lack of evidence to support their responsiveness in this patient population.

methodsOne hundred sixty-eight subjects with prostate cancer were surveyed at baseline and at 6 months using the SF-12 v2 and FACT-P version 4. Internal responsiveness was assessed using paired t test and generalized estimating equation. External responsiveness was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis.

resultsThe internal responsiveness of the FACT-P and SF-12 v2 to detect positive change was satisfactory. The FACT-P and SF-12 v2 could not detect negative change. The FACT-P and the SF-12 v2 performed the best in distinguishing between improved general health and worsened general health. The FACT-P performed better in distinguishing between unchanged general health and worsened general health. The SF-12 v2 performed better in distinguishing between unchanged general health and improved general health.

conclusionsPositive change detected by these measures should be interpreted with caution as they might be too responsive to detect "noise," which is not clinically significant. The ability of the FACT-P and the SF-12 v2 to detect negative change was disappointing. The internal and external responsiveness of the social well-being of the FACT-P cannot be supported, suggesting that it is not suitable to longitudinally monitor the social component of HRQOL in prostate cancer patients. The study suggested that generic and disease-specific measures should be used together to complement each other.

Indexed as

Health SurveysSickness Impact ProfileAgedHumansLongitudinal StudiesMaleProspective StudiesProstatic NeoplasmsSurveys and QuestionnairesChineseFACT-PHealth-related quality of lifeInstrumentProstate cancerResponsivenessSF-12

Identifiers

PMID26908258
OpenAlexW2283979431

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.