Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26908244›Full record

ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2016

CERAPP: Collaborative Estrogen Receptor Activity Prediction Project.

Kamel Mansouri, Ahmed Abdelaziz, Aleksandra Rybacka, Alessandra Roncaglioni, Alexander Tropsha, Alexandre Varnek, Alexey Zakharov, Andrew Worth, Ann M Richard, Christopher M Grulke and 31 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 158 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
158citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

158 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. SynergisticiScience · 2026
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Multimodal Cross-Attentive Graph-Based Framework for Predicting In Vivo Endocrine Disruptors.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Systematic evaluation of the evidence base on ethylCurrent research in toxicology · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Environmental science & technology · 2025
    Review
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article

98 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

41 authors.

Kamel MansouriNational Center for Computational Toxicology, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Ahmed Abdelaziz
Aleksandra Rybacka
Alessandra Roncaglioni
Alexander Tropsha
Alexandre Varnek
Alexey Zakharov
Andrew Worth
Ann M Richard
Christopher M Grulke
Daniela Trisciuzzi
Denis Fourches
Dragos Horvath
Emilio Benfenati
Eugene Muratov
Eva Bay Wedebye
Francesca Grisoni
Giuseppe F Mangiatordi
Giuseppina M Incisivo
Huixiao Hong
Hui W Ng
Igor V Tetko
Ilya Balabin
Jayaram Kancherla
Jie Shen
Julien Burton
Marc Nicklaus
Matteo Cassotti
Nikolai G Nikolov
Orazio Nicolotti
Patrik L Andersson
Qingda Zang
Regina Politi
Richard D Beger
Roberto Todeschini
Ruili Huang
Sherif Farag
Sine A Rosenberg
Svetoslav Slavov
Xin Hu
Richard S Judson

Funding

Toxicology in the 21st Century Program (Tox21) - Computational ToxicologyZIATR000040 · NCATS · NATIONAL CENTER FOR ADVANCING TRANSLATIONAL SCIENCES · PI HUANG, RUILI · 2016 to 2025
$3.5M
UNC Predoc Training Progr in Bioinformatics/Comp BiologyT32GM067553 · NIGMS · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI ELSTON, TIMOTHY C · 2005 to 2019
$2.5M
Tools for Prediction of Drug Metabolism and MetabolitesZIABC011336 · NCI · DIVISION OF BASIC SCIENCES - NCI · PI NICKLAUS, MARC · 2010 to 2020
$1.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM067553
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundHumans are exposed to thousands of man-made chemicals in the environment. Some chemicals mimic natural endocrine hormones and, thus, have the potential to be endocrine disruptors. Most of these chemicals have never been tested for their ability to interact with the estrogen receptor (ER). Risk assessors need tools to prioritize chemicals for evaluation in costly in vivo tests, for instance, within the U.S. EPA Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program.

objectivesWe describe a large-scale modeling project called CERAPP (Collaborative Estrogen Receptor Activity Prediction Project) and demonstrate the efficacy of using predictive computational models trained on high-throughput screening data to evaluate thousands of chemicals for ER-related activity and prioritize them for further testing.

methodsCERAPP combined multiple models developed in collaboration with 17 groups in the United States and Europe to predict ER activity of a common set of 32,464 chemical structures. Quantitative structure-activity relationship models and docking approaches were employed, mostly using a common training set of 1,677 chemical structures provided by the U.S. EPA, to build a total of 40 categorical and 8 continuous models for binding, agonist, and antagonist ER activity. All predictions were evaluated on a set of 7,522 chemicals curated from the literature. To overcome the limitations of single models, a consensus was built by weighting models on scores based on their evaluated accuracies.

resultsIndividual model scores ranged from 0.69 to 0.85, showing high prediction reliabilities. Out of the 32,464 chemicals, the consensus model predicted 4,001 chemicals (12.3%) as high priority actives and 6,742 potential actives (20.8%) to be considered for further testing.

conclusionThis project demonstrated the possibility to screen large libraries of chemicals using a consensus of different in silico approaches. This concept will be applied in future projects related to other end points. CITATION: Mansouri K, Abdelaziz A, Rybacka A, Roncaglioni A, Tropsha A, Varnek A, Zakharov A, Worth A, Richard AM, Grulke CM, Trisciuzzi D, Fourches D, Horvath D, Benfenati E, Muratov E, Wedebye EB, Grisoni F, Mangiatordi GF, Incisivo GM, Hong H, Ng HW, Tetko IV, Balabin I, Kancherla J, Shen J, Burton J, Nicklaus M, Cassotti M, Nikolov NG, Nicolotti O, Andersson PL, Zang Q, Politi R, Beger RD, Todeschini R, Huang R, Farag S, Rosenberg SA, Slavov S, Hu X, Judson RS. 2016. CERAPP: Collaborative Estrogen Receptor Activity Prediction Project. Environ Health Perspect 124:1023-1033; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1510267.

Indexed as

Toxicity TestsComputer SimulationEndocrine DisruptorsEnvironmental PolicyQuantitative Structure-Activity RelationshipReceptors, EstrogenUnited StatesEndocrine DisruptorsReceptors, Estrogen

Identifiers

PMID26908244
PMCPMC4937869

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC0
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.