ArticleEnvironmental health perspectives2016
CERAPP: Collaborative Estrogen Receptor Activity Prediction Project.
Article in Environmental health perspectives, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 158 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
158 citing papers in PubMed.
- SynergisticiScience · 2026Article
- Expanded Tox21 Biological Assay Panel for the Prediction of Drug-Induced Liver Injury and Cardiotoxicity.Environmental health perspectives · 2026Article
- Article
- Democratizing Artificial Intelligence in Toxicology: Real-World Applications and Automated Computational Workflows.Chemical research in toxicology · 2026Review
- Classification of Thyroid Peroxidase (TPO) Inhibitors Using Transfer Learning with SMILES Embeddings.Chemical research in toxicology · 2026Article
- Multimodal Cross-Attentive Graph-Based Framework for Predicting In Vivo Endocrine Disruptors.Advanced science (Weinheim, Baden-Wurttemberg, Germany) · 2026Article
- SPARFlow: a KNIME workflow for integrated structure-activity or structure-property relationship analysis.Journal of cheminformatics · 2026Article
- Leveraging Consensus Docking Approaches for Human Mitochondrial Complexes I and III.Chemical research in toxicology · 2026Article
- Systematic evaluation of the evidence base on ethylCurrent research in toxicology · 2026Review
- Multi-task deep learning models for mechanism-based prediction of developmental and reproductive toxicity (DART) using ToxCast bioassays.Frontiers in toxicology · 2026Article
- The E-Morph Screening Assay: Phenotypic Screening for Estrogenic or Anti-estrogenic Compound Activities.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2026Article
- In vitro confirmation of estrogenic and antiandrogenic pesticide bioactivity using schild regression analysis.Toxicology and applied pharmacology · 2025Article
- Identifying Gene Predictors of Chemicals Linked With Breast Cancer: A Machine Learning Analysis of MCF7 Cellular Transcriptomic Screening Data.Environmental and molecular mutagenesis · 2025Article
- Mapping the Rise in Machine Learning in Environmental Chemical Research: A Bibliometric Analysis.Toxics · 2025Review
- Review
- An in silico to in vivo approach identifies retinoid-X receptor activating tert-butylphenols used in food contact materials.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Machine Learning and Large Language Models for Modeling Complex Toxicity Pathways and Predicting Steroidogenesis.Environmental science & technology · 2025Article
- Integrating Transcriptomic and Targeted New Approach Methodologies into a Tiered Framework for Chemical Bioactivity Screening.Environmental health perspectives · 2025Article
- Screening for Endocrine Bioactivity Potential of Tobacco Product Chemicals Including Flavor Chemicals.Environmental toxicology · 2025Article
- Comparative Analysis of Chemical Distribution Models for Quantitative In Vitro to In Vivo Extrapolation.Toxics · 2025Article
98 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
41 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundHumans are exposed to thousands of man-made chemicals in the environment. Some chemicals mimic natural endocrine hormones and, thus, have the potential to be endocrine disruptors. Most of these chemicals have never been tested for their ability to interact with the estrogen receptor (ER). Risk assessors need tools to prioritize chemicals for evaluation in costly in vivo tests, for instance, within the U.S. EPA Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program.
objectivesWe describe a large-scale modeling project called CERAPP (Collaborative Estrogen Receptor Activity Prediction Project) and demonstrate the efficacy of using predictive computational models trained on high-throughput screening data to evaluate thousands of chemicals for ER-related activity and prioritize them for further testing.
methodsCERAPP combined multiple models developed in collaboration with 17 groups in the United States and Europe to predict ER activity of a common set of 32,464 chemical structures. Quantitative structure-activity relationship models and docking approaches were employed, mostly using a common training set of 1,677 chemical structures provided by the U.S. EPA, to build a total of 40 categorical and 8 continuous models for binding, agonist, and antagonist ER activity. All predictions were evaluated on a set of 7,522 chemicals curated from the literature. To overcome the limitations of single models, a consensus was built by weighting models on scores based on their evaluated accuracies.
resultsIndividual model scores ranged from 0.69 to 0.85, showing high prediction reliabilities. Out of the 32,464 chemicals, the consensus model predicted 4,001 chemicals (12.3%) as high priority actives and 6,742 potential actives (20.8%) to be considered for further testing.
conclusionThis project demonstrated the possibility to screen large libraries of chemicals using a consensus of different in silico approaches. This concept will be applied in future projects related to other end points. CITATION: Mansouri K, Abdelaziz A, Rybacka A, Roncaglioni A, Tropsha A, Varnek A, Zakharov A, Worth A, Richard AM, Grulke CM, Trisciuzzi D, Fourches D, Horvath D, Benfenati E, Muratov E, Wedebye EB, Grisoni F, Mangiatordi GF, Incisivo GM, Hong H, Ng HW, Tetko IV, Balabin I, Kancherla J, Shen J, Burton J, Nicklaus M, Cassotti M, Nikolov NG, Nicolotti O, Andersson PL, Zang Q, Politi R, Beger RD, Todeschini R, Huang R, Farag S, Rosenberg SA, Slavov S, Hu X, Judson RS. 2016. CERAPP: Collaborative Estrogen Receptor Activity Prediction Project. Environ Health Perspect 124:1023-1033; http://dx.doi.org/10.1289/ehp.1510267.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.