Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26908243›Full record

ArticleWorld journal of surgery2016

Are Routine Blood Group and Save Samples Needed for Laparoscopic Day Case Surgery?

Peter M Thomson, Jack Ross, Samrat Mukherjee, Borzoueh Mohammadi

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in World journal of surgery, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
0.3field-weighted citation impact, top 37% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Routine group and save screening prior to emergency laparoscopic surgery.Annals of the Royal College of Surgeons of England · 2021
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Peter M ThomsonDepartment of Upper GI Surgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 235 Euston Road, Fitzrovia, London, NW1 2BU, UK. peter.thomson1@nhs.net.
Jack RossDepartment of Upper GI Surgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 235 Euston Road, Fitzrovia, London, NW1 2BU, UK.
Samrat MukherjeeDepartment of Upper GI Surgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 235 Euston Road, Fitzrovia, London, NW1 2BU, UK.
Borzoueh MohammadiDepartment of Upper GI Surgery, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, 235 Euston Road, Fitzrovia, London, NW1 2BU, UK.
University College London · GBUniversity College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundCommon day case laparoscopic procedures are usually safe, with low rates of bleeding complications. At our trust, most patients undergo pre-operative group and save (G&S) for these procedures, at a cost of £18.39 per sample excluding laboratory staffing costs. Our aim was to assess if routine G&S is indicated.

methodsWe performed a retrospective review of all patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC), laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIH) and diagnostic laparoscopy (DL) in our institution between April 2012 and March 2014. Patients were identified using hospital coding records. Transfusion department records were reviewed to see which patients had undergone pre-operative G&S or cross-match, and peri-operative transfusion.

resultsFive hundred and thirty-two procedures were performed in 2 years: 293 LC, 123 LIH and 116 DL. G&S was performed in 256 (87 %; LC), 67 (54 %; LIH) and 88 (76 %; DL), respectively. Zero patients were transfused for bleeding complications. One patient was transfused following diagnostic laparoscopy to optimise pre-existing anaemia. The total cost of G&S over the study period was £7558.

conclusionBlood transfusion rates for bleeding complications following laparoscopic day case surgery are 0 % in our unit. G&S samples for these procedures cost £7558 over 2 years. Abandoning pre-operative G&S for these patients appears to be clinically indicated and would lead to substantial financial savings.

Indexed as

Ambulatory Surgical ProceduresCholecystectomy, LaparoscopicHerniorrhaphyBlood Group AntigensBlood Loss, SurgicalBlood TransfusionHealth Care CostsHernia, InguinalHumansPreoperative CareRetrospective StudiesBlood Group Antigens

Identifiers

PMID26908243
OpenAlexW2274296462

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.