Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26908131›Full record

ReviewInfection2016

Infectious diseases consultations can make the difference: a brief review and a plea for more infectious diseases specialists in Germany.

Siegbert Rieg, Marc Fabian Küpper

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in Infection, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 31 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
31citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
11.1field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

31 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 71 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Guideline
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Clinical Roles of Infectious Diseases Specialists in Ophthalmology.Infectious diseases & clinical microbiology · 2025
    Article
  7. [Outpatient parenteral anti-infective therapy (OPAT)].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Article
  8. Observational
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Review
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Review
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Siegbert RiegDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine II, University Medical Center, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany. siegbert.rieg@uniklinik-freiburg.de.
Marc Fabian KüpperDivision of Infectious Diseases, Department of Medicine II, University Medical Center, Albert-Ludwigs-University Freiburg, Hugstetter Str. 55, 79106, Freiburg, Germany.
University Medical Center Freiburg · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Trained infectious diseases (ID) specialists are an integral part of inpatient and outpatient care in many countries, however, these specialized services are established only in selected tertiary care hospitals in Germany. This review summarises studies that addressed the impact of ID consultation services on patient care and outcome. Extensive data for a clinical benefit is available in the context of Staphylococcus aureus bacteremia (SAB), in which in-hospital or 30-day mortality was significantly reduced by 40-50 % in patients evaluated and treated in cooperation with ID consultants. This effect was associated with improved adherence to quality-of-care standards. Moreover, newer studies show a reduced length of hospital stay due to ID consultations, especially if patients are evaluated early in the course of their hospital stay. Of note, informal consultations do not seem to be equivalent to a formal ID consultation with bedside patient evaluation. Studies in other patient groups (solid organ transplant recipients or intensive care unit patients) or in the context of other infections (infective endocarditis, pneumonia, other bloodstream infections) also revealed positive effects of ID consultations. Higher rates of appropriate empirical and targeted antimicrobial treatments and de-escalation strategies due to successful pathogen identification were documented. These modifications resulted in lower treatment costs and decreased antimicrobial resistance development. Although there are methodological limitations in single studies, we consider the consistent and reproducible positive effects of ID consultations shown in studies in different countries and health care systems as convincing evidence for improved quality-of-care and treatment outcomes in patients with infectious diseases. Thus, we strongly recommend efforts to establish significantly more ID consultation services in hospitals in Germany.

Indexed as

SpecializationBacteremiaGermanyHumansLength of StayQuality of Health CareReferral and ConsultationStaphylococcal InfectionsStaphylococcus aureusSurvival AnalysisTreatment OutcomeBacteremiaClinical Infectious diseases servicesInfectious diseases consultationQuality indicatorQuality-of-careStaphylococcus aureus

Identifiers

PMID26908131
OpenAlexW2287800725

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.