Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26908127›Full record

Trial reportThe AAPS journal2016

Establishing the Quantitative Relationship Between Lanreotide Autogel®, Chromogranin A, and Progression-Free Survival in Patients with Nonfunctioning Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors.

Núria Buil-Bruna, Marion Dehez, Amandine Manon, Thi Xuan Quyen Nguyen, Iñaki F Trocóniz

Abstract readClinical Trial, Phase IIIMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in The AAPS journal, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Clinical utility of lanreotide AutogelDrug design, development and therapy · 2016
    Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Núria Buil-BrunaPharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology, School of Pharmacy, University of Navarra, Irunlarrea 1, 31080, Pamplona, Spain.
Marion DehezClinical Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacokinetics and Drug Metabolism, Ipsen Innovation, Les Ulis, France.
Amandine ManonClinical Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacokinetics and Drug Metabolism, Ipsen Innovation, Les Ulis, France.
Thi Xuan Quyen NguyenClinical Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacokinetics and Drug Metabolism, Ipsen Innovation, Les Ulis, France.
Iñaki F TrocónizPharmacometrics & Systems Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacy and Pharmaceutical Technology, School of Pharmacy, University of Navarra, Irunlarrea 1, 31080, Pamplona, Spain. itroconiz@unav.es.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The objective of this work was to establish the quantitative relationship between Lanreotide Autogel® (LAN) on serum chromogranin A (CgA) and progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with nonfunctioning gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs) through an integrated pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic (PK/PD) model. In CLARINET, a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, 204 patients received deep subcutaneous injections of LAN 120 mg (n = 101) or placebo (n = 103) every 4 weeks for 96 weeks. Data for 810 LAN and 1298 CgA serum samples (n = 632 placebo and n = 666 LAN) were used to develop a parametric time-to-event model to relate CgA levels and PFS (76 patients experienced disease progression: n = 49 placebo and n = 27 LAN). LAN serum profiles were described by a one-compartment disposition model. Absorption was characterized by two parallel pathways following first- and zero-order kinetics. As PFS data were considered informative dropouts, CgA and PFS responses were modeled jointly. The LAN-induced decrease in CgA levels was described by an inhibitory E MAX model. Patient age and target lesions at baseline were associated with an increment in baseline CgA. Weibull model distribution showed that decreases in CgA from baseline reduced the hazard of disease progression significantly (P < 0.001). Covariates of tumor location in the pancreas and tumor hepatic tumor load were associated with worse prognosis (P < 0.001). We established a semimechanistic PK/PD model to better understand the effect of LAN on a surrogate endpoint (serum CgA) and ultimately the clinical endpoint (PFS) in treatment-naive patients with nonfunctioning GEP-NETs.

Indexed as

AdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic AgentsChromogranin ADelayed-Action PreparationsDisease-Free SurvivalDouble-Blind MethodFemaleGelsHumansIntestinal NeoplasmsMaleMiddle AgedNeuroendocrine TumorsPancreatic NeoplasmsAntineoplastic AgentsChromogranin ADelayed-Action PreparationsGelslanreotidePeptides, CyclicSomatostatinchromogranin Alanreotideneuroendocrine tumorspopulation PK/PDtime-to-event analysis

Identifiers

PMID26908127
PMCPMC5256603

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.