ArticleInternational journal of emergency medicine2016
Predictors of early progression to severe sepsis or shock among emergency department patients with nonsevere sepsis.
Article in International journal of emergency medicine, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 43 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
43 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.
- Early prognostication of septic shock in Korean adults aged 80 years and over: serum albumin combined with Sequential Organ Failure Assessment Score.Acute and critical care · 2026Article
- The association between albumin/neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio score and all-cause mortality in critically ill patients with atrial fibrillation: a retrospective study from Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care IV (MIMIC-IV) database.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Non-linear associations between red blood cell distribution width/serum albumin ratio with diabetic kidney disease: results from two nationwide studies in the United States and China.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Unnecessary fluid therapy in patients with shock: Five classic fluid pitfalls and five ways to do it better.Annals of intensive care · 2026Review
- Article
- Impact of diastolic blood pressure time under range on mortality and acute kidney injury in septic patients: a retrospective cohort study.BMC anesthesiology · 2025Article
- SEPSIGN: early identification of sepsis signs in emergency department.Internal and emergency medicine · 2025Observational
- Mortality and antibiotic timing in deep learning-derived surviving sepsis campaign risk groups: a multicenter study.Critical care (London, England) · 2025Observational
- Development and validation of a prognostic nomogram model for severe osteomyelitis patients.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Development and validation of a triglyceride-glucose integrated nomogram for acute kidney injury prediction in acute myocardial infarction patients: a multicenter database study.Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine · 2025Article
- Article
- Diastolic/systolic blood pressure ratio for predicting febrile children with sepsis and progress to septic shock in the emergency department.BMC emergency medicine · 2024Article
- Stratification of Sepsis Patients on Admission into the Intensive Care Unit According to Differential Plasma Metabolic Phenotypes.Journal of proteome research · 2024Article
- Association between red cell distribution width-to-albumin ratio and prognostic outcomes in pediatric intensive care unit patients: a retrospective cohort study.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2024Article
- Biomarkers to Predict Multiorgan Distress Syndrome and Acute Kidney Injury in Critically Ill Surgical Patients.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2023Article
- Association between diastolic blood pressure during the first 24 h and 28-day mortality in patients with septic shock: a retrospective observational study.European journal of medical research · 2023Observational
- Fluids and Early Vasopressors in the Management of Septic Shock: Do We Have the Right Answers Yet?Journal of critical care medicine (Universitatea de Medicina si Farmacie din Targu-Mures) · 2023Review
- The National Early Warning Score 2(NEWS2) to Predict Early Progression to Severe Community-Acquired Pneumonia.Tropical medicine and infectious disease · 2023Article
- Relationship between red blood cell distribution width-to-albumin ratio and outcome of septic patients with atrial fibrillation: a retrospective cohort study.BMC cardiovascular disorders · 2022Article
- The Multicenter Collaborative to Enhance Biologic Understanding, Quality, and Outcomes in Cardiogenic Shock (VANQUISH Shock): Rationale and Design.The Canadian journal of cardiology · 2022Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 7 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundProgression from nonsevere sepsis-i.e., sepsis without organ failure or shock-to severe sepsis or shock among emergency department (ED) patients has been associated with significant mortality. Early recognition in the ED of those who progress to severe sepsis or shock during their hospital course may improve patient outcomes. We sought to identify clinical, demographic, and laboratory parameters that predict progression to severe sepsis, septic shock, or death within 96 h of ED triage among patients with initial presentation of nonsevere sepsis.
methodsThis is a retrospective cohort of patients presenting to a single urban academic ED from November 2008 to October 2010. Patients aged 18 years or older who met criteria for sepsis and had a lactate level measured in the ED were included. Patients were excluded if they had any combination of the following: a systolic blood pressure <90 mmHg upon triage, an initial whole blood lactate level ≥4 mmol/L, or one or more of a set of predefined signs of organ dysfunction upon initial assessment. Disease progression was defined as the development of any combination of the aforementioned conditions, initiation of vasopressors, or death within 96 h of ED presentation. Data on predefined potential predictors of disease progression and outcome measures of disease progression were collected by a query of the electronic medical record and via chart review. Logistic regression was used to assess associations of potential predictor variables with a composite outcome measure of sepsis progression to organ failure, hypotension, or death.
resultsIn this cohort of 582 ED patients with nonsevere sepsis, 108 (18.6 %) experienced disease progression. Initial serum albumin <3.5 mg/dL (OR 4.82; 95 % CI 2.40-9.69; p < 0.01) and a diastolic blood pressure <52 mmHg at ED triage (OR 4.59; 95 % CI 1.57-13.39; p < 0.01) were independently associated with disease progression to severe sepsis or shock within 96 h of ED presentation. There were no deaths within 96 h of ED presentation.
conclusionsIn our patient cohort, serum albumin <3.5 g/dL and an ED triage diastolic blood pressure <52 mmHg independently predict early progression to severe sepsis or shock among ED patients with presumed sepsis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.