Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26907962›Full record

ArticleThe Analyst2016

Highly efficient and selective isolation of rare tumor cells using a microfluidic chip with wavy-herringbone micro-patterned surfaces.

Shunqiang Wang, Antony Thomas, Elaine Lee, Shu Yang, Xuanhong Cheng, Yaling Liu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Analyst, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 20 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
20citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

20 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Microfluidics for the Isolation and Detection of Circulating Tumor Cells.Advances in experimental medicine and biology · 2022
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Liquid Biopsy in Solid Malignancy.Genetic testing and molecular biomarkers · 2019
    Review
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Numerical simulation of cell squeezing through a micropore by the immersed boundary method.Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers. Part C. Journal of mechanical engineering science · 2018
    Article
  16. Review
  17. Review
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Shunqiang WangDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA. yal310@lehigh.edu.
Antony ThomasBioengineering Program, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA.
Elaine LeeLawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94550, USA and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Shu YangDepartment of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Xuanhong ChengBioengineering Program, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA and Department of Materials Science and Engineering, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA.
Yaling LiuDepartment of Mechanical Engineering and Mechanics, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA. yal310@lehigh.edu and Bioengineering Program, Lehigh University, Bethlehem, PA 18015, USA.

Funding

An Integrated Biometric Platform for Evaluation of Nanomedicine DeliveryR15EB015105 · NIBIB · LEHIGH UNIVERSITY · PI LIU, YALING · 2013 to 2013
$443k
NIBIB NIH HHS EB015105NIBIB NIH HHS R15 EB015105
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in peripheral blood have been recognized as a general biomarker for diagnosing cancer and providing guidance for personalized treatments. Yet due to their rarity, the challenge for their clinical utility lies in the efficient isolation while avoiding the capture of other non-targeted white blood cells (WBCs). In this paper, a wavy-herringbone (HB) microfluidic chip coated with antibody directly against epithelial cell adhesion molecule (anti-EpCAM) was developed for highly efficient and selective isolation of tumor cells from tumor cell-spiked whole blood samples. By extending the concept of the hallmark HB-Chip in the literature, the wavy-HB chip not only achieves high capture efficiency (up to 85.0%) by micro-vortexes induced by HB structures, but also achieves high purity (up to 39.4%) due to the smooth wavy microstructures. These smooth wavy-HB structures eliminate the ultra-low shear rate regions in the traditional grooved-HB structures that lead to non-specific trapping of cells. Compared with the grooved-HB chip with sharp corners, the wavy-HB chip shows significantly higher purity while maintaining similarly high capture efficiency. Furthermore, the wavy-HB chip has up to 11% higher captured cell viability over the grooved-HB chip. The distributions of tumor cells and WBCs along the grooves and waves are investigated to help understand the mechanisms behind the better performance of the wavy-HB chip. The wavy-HB chip may serve as a promising platform for CTC capture and cancer diagnosis.

Indexed as

Lab-On-A-Chip DevicesCell SeparationEquipment DesignHCT116 CellsHumansNeoplastic Cells, CirculatingShear StrengthSurface Properties

Identifiers

PMID26907962
PMCPMC5051543

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.