Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26907595›Full record

SynthesisChemosphere2016

Meta-analysis of ionic liquid literature and toxicology.

Mary E Heckenbach, Felicia N Romero, Matthew D Green, Rolf U Halden

Open access · greenAbstract readMeta-AnalysisReview
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Chemosphere, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
6.2field-weighted citation impact, top 3% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed, 89 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Ecotoxicity interspecies study of ionic liquids based on phosphonium and ammonium cations.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2021
    Article
  8. Ionic Liquids-A Review of Their Toxicity to Living Organisms.International journal of molecular sciences · 2021
    Review
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Ionic liquids for addressing unmet needs in healthcare.Bioengineering & translational medicine · 2018
    Review
  14. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Mary E HeckenbachBarrett, The Honors College, School of Life Sciences, College of Liberal Arts and Sciences, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.
Felicia N RomeroBarrett, The Honors College, Chemical Engineering, School for Engineering of Matter, Transport, and Energy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85281, USA.
Matthew D GreenChemical Engineering, School for Engineering of Matter, Transport, and Energy, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-6106, USA.
Rolf U HaldenCenter for Environmental Security and Global Security Initiative, The Biodesign Institute, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ 85287-5904, USA. Electronic address: halden@asu.edu.
Arizona State University · US

Funding

Novel Approaches to Studying the Situ Bioremediation of Complex MixturesR01ES015445 · NIEHS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI HALDEN, ROLF U · 2006 to 2009
$1.0M
In Situ Sampling Tool for Assessing Bioavailability and Toxicity of SedimentsR01ES020889 · NIEHS · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI DENSLOW, NANCY D, HALDEN, ROLF U · 2011 to 2013
$874k
NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES015445NIEHS NIH HHS R01 ES020889
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

A meta-analysis was conducted to compare the total amount of ionic liquid (IL) literature (n = 39,036) to the body of publications dealing with IL toxicity (n = 213) with the goal of establishing the state of knowledge and existing information gaps. Additionally, patent literature pertaining to issued patents utilizing ILs (n = 3358) or dealing with IL toxicity (n = 112) were analyzed. Total publishing activity and patent count served to gauge research activity, industrial usage and toxicology knowledge of ILs. Five of the most commonly studied IL cations were identified and used to establish a relationship between toxicity data and potential of commercial use: imidazolium, ammonium, phosphonium, pyridinium, and pyrrolidinium. Toxicology publications for all IL cations represented 0.55% ± 0.27% of the total publishing activity; compared with other industrial chemicals, these numbers indicate that there is still a paucity of studies on the adverse effects of this class of chemical. Toxicity studies on ILs were dominated by the use of in vitro models (18%) and marine bacteria (15%) as studied biological systems. Whole animal studies (n = 87) comprised 31% of IL toxicity studies, with a subset of in vivo mammalian models consisting of 8%. Human toxicology data were found to be limited to in vitro analyses, indicating substantial knowledge gaps. Risks from long-term and chronic low-level exposure to ILs have not been established yet for any model organisms, reemphasizing the need to fill crucial knowledge gaps concerning human health effects and the environmental safety of ILs. Adding to the existing knowledge of the molecular toxicity characteristics of ILs can help inform the design of greener, less toxic and more benign IL technologies.

Indexed as

AnimalsCationsEnvironmental PollutantsGreen Chemistry TechnologyHumansIonic LiquidsLethal Dose 50Patents as TopicSolventsCationsEnvironmental PollutantsIonic LiquidsSolventsEnvironmental healthGreen chemistryIonic liquidsMeta-analysisSustainabilityToxicity

Identifiers

PMID26907595
PMCPMC4789176
OpenAlexW2284414991

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.