ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2016
Recurrent glioblastoma: who receives tumor specific treatment and how often?
Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.
- Sex-Specific Differences in Glioblastoma.Cells · 2021Review
- Cancer Stem Cell Chemotherapeutics Assay for Prospective Treatment of Recurrent Glioblastoma and Progressive Anaplastic Glioma: A Single-Institution Case Series.Translational oncology · 2020Article
- Article
- Exploring the gender dimension of problems and needs of patients receiving specialist palliative care in a German palliative care unit - the perspectives of patients and healthcare professionals.BMC palliative care · 2019Article
- Re-irradiation in elderly patients with glioblastoma: a single institution experience.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2019Article
- Functional Blockade of Small GTPase RAN Inhibits Glioblastoma Cell Viability.Frontiers in oncology · 2018Article
- Salvage re-irradiation for recurrent high-grade glioma and comparison to bevacizumab alone.Journal of neuro-oncology · 2017Article
- M2 macrophages are more resistant than M1 macrophages following radiation therapy in the context of glioblastoma.Oncotarget · 2017Article
- Analysis of Chemopredictive Assay for Targeting Cancer Stem Cells in Glioblastoma Patients.Translational oncology · 2017Article
- Treatment of unmethylated MGMT-promoter recurrent glioblastoma with cancer stem cell assay-guided chemotherapy and the impact on patients' healthcare costs.Neuro-oncology advancesArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The recurrence of glioblastoma (rGBM) is inevitable and often short-term. Therefore, information on the prognosis and effectiveness of tumor-specific versus purely palliative approaches should be more in-depth than a mere list of available treatment options for patients in this situation. However, follow-up data on the course of the disease in unselected patient populations after completion of primary treatment are scarce. This single-center analysis investigated the rate and number of glioblastoma recurrences after initial radiotherapy in 189 consecutive GM patients, focusing on the incidence of early death and the frequency of tumor-specific treatment (TST) versus best-supportive care (BSC) as well as the outcomes for the different approaches. In 61 % of initial population first recurrence (rGBM) could be determined by histology or imaging. 47 % received TST. 58 % of the patients with rGBM and TST were diagnosed with a second recurrence. Up to five recurrences were treated. 35-45 % of patients died before undergoing imaging studies to confirm the next recurrence. Multivariate analysis identified male sex and KPS score as independent factors (p < 0.01) for the choice of TST over BSC. Median overall survival from the diagnosis of first recurrence was 267 days in the TST group versus 65 days in patients receiving BSC (p < 0.0001). Nearly half of all rGBM patients received second-line TST, but a remarkably high proportion died early. Gender and KPS played a role in the choice of TST over BSC for recurrence treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.