Evidence map›Paper›PMID 26907492›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuro-oncology2016

Recurrent glioblastoma: who receives tumor specific treatment and how often?

Rieke Steffens, Sabine Semrau, Godehard Lahmer, Florian Putz, Sebastian Lettmaier, Ilker Eyüpoglu, Michael Buchfelder, Rainer Fietkau

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuro-oncology, 2016. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Disease markers · 2020
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Rieke SteffensDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstr. 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Sabine SemrauDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstr. 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany. sabine.semrau@uk-erlangen.de.
Godehard LahmerDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstr. 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Florian PutzDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstr. 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Sebastian LettmaierDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstr. 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Ilker EyüpogluDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Schwabachanlage 6, Erlangen, 91054, Germany.
Michael BuchfelderDepartment of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Erlangen, Schwabachanlage 6, Erlangen, 91054, Germany.
Rainer FietkauDepartment of Radiation Oncology, Friedrich Alexander University of Erlangen-Nuremberg, Universitätsstr. 27, 91054, Erlangen, Germany.
Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg · DEUniversitätsklinikum Erlangen · DE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The recurrence of glioblastoma (rGBM) is inevitable and often short-term. Therefore, information on the prognosis and effectiveness of tumor-specific versus purely palliative approaches should be more in-depth than a mere list of available treatment options for patients in this situation. However, follow-up data on the course of the disease in unselected patient populations after completion of primary treatment are scarce. This single-center analysis investigated the rate and number of glioblastoma recurrences after initial radiotherapy in 189 consecutive GM patients, focusing on the incidence of early death and the frequency of tumor-specific treatment (TST) versus best-supportive care (BSC) as well as the outcomes for the different approaches. In 61 % of initial population first recurrence (rGBM) could be determined by histology or imaging. 47 % received TST. 58 % of the patients with rGBM and TST were diagnosed with a second recurrence. Up to five recurrences were treated. 35-45 % of patients died before undergoing imaging studies to confirm the next recurrence. Multivariate analysis identified male sex and KPS score as independent factors (p < 0.01) for the choice of TST over BSC. Median overall survival from the diagnosis of first recurrence was 267 days in the TST group versus 65 days in patients receiving BSC (p < 0.0001). Nearly half of all rGBM patients received second-line TST, but a remarkably high proportion died early. Gender and KPS played a role in the choice of TST over BSC for recurrence treatment.

Indexed as

AgedBrain NeoplasmsFemaleFollow-Up StudiesGlioblastomaHumansMaleMiddle AgedMultivariate AnalysisNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalSex FactorsSurvival AnalysisBest supportive careGenderGlioblastomaRecurrenceTumor-specific treatment

Identifiers

PMID26907492
OpenAlexW2280764731

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.